Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lecavalier, L.
Right arrow Articles by Chiasson, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lecavalier, L.
Right arrow Articles by Chiasson, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 10, Issue 3 300-305, Copyright © 1987 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple injections on insulin receptors in insulin-dependent diabetics

L Lecavalier, J Havrankova, P Hamet and JL Chiasson

We compared continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple injections (MI) in the treatment of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) to assess the effect of glucose control on monocyte insulin receptors. Each IDDM patient (n = 8) was treated for 2 mo by MI (HS Ultralente and AC boluses of regular insulin) and for 2 mo by CSII in a randomized fashion. Prestudy preprandial/postprandial blood glucose levels were 199 +/- 33/261 +/- 28 mg/dl and improved to 124 +/- 12/156 +/- 13 mg/dl during MI and to 115 +/- 11/151 +/- 11 mg/dl during CSII. Glycosylated hemoglobin before the study was 10.1 +/- 0.5% and decreased to 8.8 +/- 0.4 and 8.3 +/- 0.3% during MI and CSII, respectively. The specific 125I-labeled insulin binding to circulating monocytes in a group of nonobese controls (n = 17) was 4.6 +/- 0.2%. In our poorly controlled diabetics during conventional therapy, the 125I-insulin binding was decreased to 3.7 +/- 0.3 (P less than .025). This was not significantly affected by MI despite good glucose control (4.0 +/- 0.3%). With CSII, however, good glucose control was associated with normalization of 125I-insulin binding to monocytes (4.7 +/- 0.27%). The affinity of the insulin receptors was normal before the study and was not affected by either MI or CSII. In conclusion, these observations demonstrate that in IDDM, intensive therapy by MI and CSII resulted in similar good glucose control, but only CSII resulted in normalization of insulin receptors on circulating monocytes.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
J. Weissberg-Benchell, J. Antisdel-Lomaglio, and R. Seshadri
Insulin Pump Therapy: A meta-analysis
Diabetes Care, April 1, 2003; 26(4): 1079 - 1087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1987 by the American Diabetes Association.