Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frauman, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Louis, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frauman, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Louis, W. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 10, Issue 5 573-578, Copyright © 1987 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Long-term use of intranasal insulin in insulin-dependent diabetic patients

AG Frauman, ME Cooper, BJ Parsons, G Jerums and WJ Louis
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

This study, in 3 phases, compared the long-term acceptability and efficacy of insulin administered by nasal spray with an intensified subcutaneous regimen in nine type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects on baseline therapy with ultralente insulin. In phase 1, patients were begun and stabilized on a regimen of ultralente daily and Actrapid insulin three times daily. Phase 2 consisted of 4 mo of this intensified subcutaneous regimen. In phase 3, intranasal administration of insulin, with 1% (wt/vol) sodium glycocholate, replaced Actrapid insulin for 4 mo. Glycemic control was compared in each of the three phases. It was possible to maintain the dose of ultralente insulin relatively constant in only six of the nine subjects during the intranasal phase of the study. The six subjects showed a significant rise in glycosylated hemoglobin during the intranasal phase (10.4 +/- 0.6% intranasal vs. 9.1 +/- 0.3% subcutaneous, P less than .05) but not in plasma or urinary glucose levels. There was no significant change in the incidence of hypoglycemic episodes during intranasal insulin therapy in this group. The other three subjects were considered treatment failures. Six of the nine original subjects expressed a preference for intranasal insulin, and one subject complained of mild nasal irritation insufficient to cease treatment. The intranasal route of administration of insulin has the potential to replace short-acting insulin as an adjunct to longer-acting insulin in some insulin-treated diabetic patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1987 by the American Diabetes Association.