Diabetes Care, Vol 16, Issue 2 503-505, Copyright © 1993 by American Diabetes Association
Influencing the attitudes of medical students toward diabetes. Results of a controlled study
RM Anderson, MB Donnelly, DW Gorenflo, MM Funnell and KJ Sheets
Department of Postgraduate Medicine/Health Professions Education, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor 48109-0201.
OBJECTIVE--To determine the effect of two educational interventions on the
diabetes-related attitudes of medical students. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
METHODS--We studied 67 junior and senior medical students who were
participating in the University of Michigan Medical School's Family
Practice elective clerkship. Students were assigned to one of two
interventions. The first was a 1-wk living-with-diabetes behavioral
simulation that involved injections, blood glucose monitoring, diet,
exercise, and record keeping. The second intervention involved reading an
autobiography about living with diabetes and viewing a videotape about the
psychosocial impact of diabetes. RESULTS--No differential impact was found
between the two interventions. However, both interventions were followed by
a modest positive change in the attitudes of the medical students (which
were very positive to begin with) toward the importance of patient autonomy
and the value of the team approach to diabetes care. The attitude gains
persisted at follow-up for patient autonomy but returned to baseline for
team care. CONCLUSIONS--This study suggests that these two educational
interventions resulted in modest increases in the already positive
attitudes of medical students toward the importance of patient autonomy and
team care in diabetes. However, because the study did not include a group
that received no treatment, we cannot be certain on this point. The
attitude gain related to team care did not persist at follow-up. These
findings are consistent with classical attitude research, which suggests
that attitudes are sensitive to influences such as these interventions, but
that attitude changes may not persist when those influences are changed or
withdrawn. We were not able to find a differential impact between the two
interventions and suspect that the general nature of the DAS used as the
dependent measure may not have been sensitive enough to capture such a
differential impact.