Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunbar, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by McKenna, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dunbar, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by McKenna, T. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 17, Issue 8 874-878, Copyright © 1994 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Premixed insulin preparations in pen syringes maintain glycemic control and are preferred by patients

JM Dunbar, PM Madden, DT Gleeson, TM Fiad and TJ McKenna
Diabetes Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.

OBJECTIVE--To examine the impact on glycemic control of substituting a range of premixed insulins for the standard treatment with patient-mixed insulin combinations. In addition, a pen-type syringe was substituted for the conventional insulin syringe, and the patients' preference was ascertained at the end of the study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS--Before the study, all patients had maintained a constant insulin dosage for 2 months. For the first month of the study, all patients were encouraged to make any adjustment in insulin dosage required to optimize control. Twenty-seven patients participated in the study. At the end of the first month, patients were randomized either to change to premixed insulins or to continue with self-mixed insulins for 2 months. At the end of the 2-month period, participants changed to the alternative regime for a further 2 months. Glycemic control was measured by assessment of glycosylated hemoglobin levels at the start of the study and after each 2-month period of the study. In addition, during the 1-month run-in period and during both 2-month study periods, a seven-point blood glucose profile was obtained extending from before breakfast to just before retiring for sleep. RESULTS--Glycosylated hemoglobin levels were unchanged throughout the duration of the study. Similarly, there were no systematic changes in individual seven-point blood glucose profiles. The frequency of hypoglycemic reactions was similar on patient-mixed and premixed insulin programs. However, 83% of patients expressed a preference for premixed insulins. A similar percentage regarded pen-type insulin syringes to be preferable to the conventional syringe. CONCLUSIONS--Glycemic control was similar on patient-mixed and premixed insulins, and patients had a marked preference for premixed insulins delivered in a pen-type syringe over conventional insulin therapy. Premixed insulin delivered by a pen-type syringe promises to ease the burden of daily injections for many diabetic patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
E. M. Davis, C. M. Christensen, K. K. Nystrom, P. A. Foral, and C. Destache
Patient satisfaction and costs associated with insulin administered by pen device or syringe during hospitalization
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 15, 2008; 65(14): 1347 - 1357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Diabetes EducatorHome page
R. P. Hayes, L. Bowman, P. O. Monahan, D. G. Marrero, and C. A. McHorney
Understanding diabetes medications from the perspective of patients with type 2 diabetes: prerequisite to medication concordance.
The Diabetes Educator, May 1, 2006; 32(3): 404 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
E. M Vivian
Comment: insulin strategies for type 2 diabetes mellitus: Author's Reply
Ann. Pharmacother., May 1, 2005; 39(5): 976 - 976.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. Peyrot and R. R. Rubin
Validity and Reliability of an Instrument for Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life and Treatment Preferences: The Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire
Diabetes Care, January 1, 2005; 28(1): 53 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
R. R. Rubin and M. Peyrot
Quality of Life, Treatment Satisfaction, and Treatment Preference Associated With Use of a Pen Device Delivering a Premixed 70/30 Insulin Aspart Suspension (Aspart Protamine Suspension/Soluble Aspart) Versus Alternative Treatment Strategies
Diabetes Care, October 1, 2004; 27(10): 2495 - 2497.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. E. DeWitt and I. B. Hirsch
Outpatient Insulin Therapy in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Scientific Review
JAMA, May 7, 2003; 289(17): 2254 - 2264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Diabetes EducatorHome page
K. E. Robertson, N. B. Glazer, and R. K. Campbell
The Latest Developments in Insulin Injection Devices
The Diabetes Educator, January 1, 2000; 26(1): 135 - 152.
[PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
Z. Nachum, I. Ben-Shlomo, E. Weiner, and E. Shalev
Twice daily versus four times daily insulin dose regimens for diabetes in pregnancy: randomised controlled trial
BMJ, November 6, 1999; 319(7219): 1223 - 1227.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1994 by the American Diabetes Association.