Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilligan, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Updike, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilligan, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Updike, S. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 17, Issue 8 882-887, Copyright © 1994 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Evaluation of a subcutaneous glucose sensor out to 3 months in a dog model

BJ Gilligan, MC Shults, RK Rhodes and SJ Updike
Biomedical Engineering Laboratory, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Center for Health Sciences, Madison.

OBJECTIVE--To advance the feasibility of an implantable long-term glucose sensor with bioprotective sensor membranes and test protocols using a somatostatin analog (octreotide). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS--Implantable sensors were constructed with one of eight bioprotective membranes and screened in vitro for stable response to glucose. Sensors were implanted subcutaneously into nondiabetic mongrel dogs and monitored at 4-min intervals via radiotelemetry. When implanted sensor responses showed evidence of tracking blood glucose after glucagon challenge (8-21 days postimplant), a glucose infusion protocol was used to assess performance. Sensor data were collected every 4 s after octreotide inhibition of endogenous insulin release. Reference plasma glucose samples were taken every 4-10 min. RESULTS--Preimplant in vitro testing of sensors verified linearity to 33.3 mM glucose and response times to 90% of equilibrium in 2-7 min. Ten implanted sensors tracked glucose for 20-114 days, during which 25 separate glucose infusion studies were conducted. The resulting regression data yielded a mean slope of 0.99 +/- 0.06, an intercept of 0.24 +/- 0.53 mM glucose, and a correlation coefficient 0.98 +/- 0.01. Long-term sensor stability was not judged adequate for clinical application, although two sensors tracked within +/- 15% for 33 and 42 days. In vivo oxygen delivery was shown to affect sensor performance. On explant, two of eight tested bioprotective membranes were found to be biostable and to fully protect the sensor's enzyme membrane. The foreign body capsule was adequately vascularized adjacent to the sensor up to 91 days postimplant. Sensor units eventually failed because of electronic problems (package leakage) or because of biodegradation or biofouling of test bioprotective membranes. CONCLUSION--Further development of this type of sensor may provide diabetic patients with a better means of monitoring blood glucose.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Pickup, L. McCartney, O. Rolinski, and D. Birch
In vivo glucose sensing for diabetes management: progress towards non-invasive monitoring
BMJ, November 13, 1999; 319(7220): 1289 - 1289.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1994 by the American Diabetes Association.