Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riley, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Blizzard, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riley, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Blizzard, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 18, Issue 9 1249-1254, Copyright © 1995 by American Diabetes Association

ARTICLES

Comparative validity of a food frequency questionnaire for adults with IDDM

MD Riley and L Blizzard
Menzies Centre for Population Health Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia. M.Riley@menzies.utas.edu.au

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the characteristics of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) in measuring dietary intake in an adult insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) population. FFQs have been widely used in developed countries to assess usual dietary intake; however, information regarding the application of the method to individuals advised to follow a specific dietary regimen (such as people with IDDM) is scarce. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The measurement of energy and macronutrients by an interviewer-administered FFQ was assessed in 84 adults, who were representative of adults with IDDM in Tasmania, Australia, by comparing it with 2 days of weighed dietary records. Mean daily energy and macronutrient intakes by each method were compared, and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for both unadjusted and energy-adjusted macronutrient intakes. RESULTS: The ratio of within-person to between-person variance in dietary estimates from weighed records was 0.53 for energy, 0.70 for fat, 2.55 for protein, 0.50 for carbohydrate, 0.78 for saturated fat, and 3.56 for dietary cholesterol. The correlation coefficient between the FFQ and a 2-day weighed dietary record for the same nutrients ranged from 0.38 for protein intake to 0.60 for saturated fat intake. The correlation coefficient between the FFQ and true usual dietary intake was estimated to be 0.60 for energy-adjusted fat intake, 0.36 for energy-adjusted protein intake, 0.72 for energy-adjusted carbohydrate intake, 0.55 for energy-adjusted saturated fat intake, and 0.77 for energy-adjusted cholesterol intake. CONCLUSIONS: People with IDDM had a low ratio of within-person to between-person variance in daily energy, fat, carbohydrate, saturate fat, and cholesterol intake. The performance of the FFQ in the IDDM population is consistent with similar questionnaires in nondiabetic populations; however, there was a significant decrease in the dietary energy estimate upon readministration of the questionnaire. Validation studies such as this are important to provide information to guide the design and analysis of investigations that use dietary questionnaires.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
G. Jones, M. D Riley, and S. Whiting
Association between urinary potassium, urinary sodium, current diet, and bone density in prepubertal children
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2001; 73(4): 839 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1995 by the American Diabetes Association.