Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trajanoski, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Pieber, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trajanoski, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Pieber, T. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 19, Issue 12 1412-1415, Copyright © 1996 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Accuracy of home blood glucose meters during hypoglycemia

Z Trajanoski, GA Brunner, RJ Gfrerer, P Wach and TR Pieber
Department of Biophysics, Graz University of Technology, Austria. trajanoski@ibmt.tu-graz.ac.at

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of home blood glucose meters during hypoglycemia. METHODS: Six blood glucose meters-One Touch II (LifeScan, Milpitas, CA), Companion II (Medisense, Cambridge, U.K.), Reflolux (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany), Accutrend (Boehringer Mannheim), Elite (Bayer, Munich, Germany), and HemoCue (HemoCue, Angelholm, Sweden)-were compared with a reference method (Beckman Glucose Analyzer 2). Glucose concentrations from arterialized venous blood samples were measured using all glucose meters (whole blood) and the reference method (plasma) during hypoglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamps in 15 subjects. RESULTS: In total, 663 blood glucose monitor readings and 119 reference values ranging from 2.28 to 3.89 mmol/l were analyzed. The correlation coefficients and the percentage of measurements within 20% and outside 40% of the reference values for each glucose meter were as follows: One Touch II: 0.91, 99.2% and 0%; Companion II: 0.81, 88.2% and 2.5%; Reflolux: 0.78, 85.0% and 0.9%; Accutrend: 0.88, 46.0% and 6.6%; Elite: 0.78, 75.6% and 4.2%; and HemoCue: 0.93, 96.6% and 0% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There were substantial differences between the blood glucose meters during hypoglycemia, and none of the devices met the latest criteria recommended by the American Diabetes Association.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
S. G. Oeyen, E. A. Hoste, C. D. Roosens, J. M. Decruyenaere, and S. I. Blot
Adherence to and Efficacy and Safety of an Insulin Protocol in the Critically Ill: A Prospective Observational Study
Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2007; 16(6): 599 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. D. Saudek, R. L. Derr, and R. R. Kalyani
Assessing Glycemia in Diabetes Using Self-monitoring Blood Glucose and Hemoglobin A1c
JAMA, April 12, 2006; 295(14): 1688 - 1697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A. D M Stork, H. Kemperman, D W. Erkelens, and T. F Veneman
Comparison of the accuracy of the hemocue glucose analyzer with the Yellow Springs Instrument glucose oxidase analyzer, particularly in hypoglycemia
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 153(2): 275 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
Z. Yared, K. Aljaberi, N. Renouf, and J.-F. Yale
The Effect of Blood Sample Volume on 11 Glucose Monitoring Systems
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2005; 28(7): 1836 - 1837.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
H T Ho, W K Y Yeung, and B W Y Young
Evaluation of "point of care" devices in the measurement of low blood glucose in neonatal practice
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2004; 89(4): F356 - F359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
L. M. Gandrud, H. U. Paguntalan, M. M. Van Wyhe, B. L. Kunselman, A. D. Leptien, D. M. Wilson, R. C. Eastman, and B. A. Buckingham
Use of the Cygnus GlucoWatch Biographer at a Diabetes Camp
Pediatrics, January 1, 2004; 113(1): 108 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
S. Skeie, G. Thue, K. Nerhus, and S. Sandberg
Instruments for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: Comparisons of Testing Quality Achieved by Patients and a Technician
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2002; 48(7): 994 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. A. Tamada, S. Garg, L. Jovanovic, K. R. Pitzer, S. Fermi, R. O. Potts, and and the Cygnus Research Team
Noninvasive Glucose Monitoring: Comprehensive Clinical Results
JAMA, November 17, 1999; 282(19): 1839 - 1844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
L. M. Demers and B. Smith
Application of the MediSense Precision-G Blood Glucose Testing System in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Clin. Chem., September 1, 1999; 45(9): 1578 - 1579.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. W. Schmidtke, A. C. Freeland, A. Heller, and R. T. Bonnecaze
Measurement and modeling of the transient difference between blood and subcutaneous glucose concentrations in the rat after injection of insulin
PNAS, January 6, 1998; 95(1): 294 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1996 by the American Diabetes Association.