Diabetes Care, Vol 19, Issue 8 812-817, Copyright © 1996 by American Diabetes Association

ARTICLES

Insulin underdelivery from implanted pumps using peritoneal route. Determinant role of insulin pump compatibility

E Renard, S Bouteleau, D Jacques-Apostol, D Lauton, F Gibert-Boulet, G Costalat, J Bringer and C Jaffiol
Department of Endocrinology, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montepellier, France.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and investigate determinants of insulin underdelivery events occurring with implanted pumps using peritoneal route from a 103 patient-year experiment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Of the MiniMed (MIP 2001) pumps implanted in 47 type I diabetic patients, 70 were refilled quarterly with four successive batches (A, B, C, D) of U400 Hoechst 21 PH neutral insulin during a 3-year study period. Any reduction of insulin flow rate > 15% was considered as abnormal insulin delivery. Diagnosis of the cause of underdelivery was established according to the response to the following steps: 1) 0.01 mol/l NaOH rinse of pump circuits to solubilize insulin aggregates, 2) surgical examination and replacement of blocked catheters, and 3) postsurgical 0.01 mol/l NaOH rinse of pump. Step 2 was selected first if the increase of insulin requirements or reduction of flow rate were > 50%. Relative contributions of insulin and the implanted system to underdelivery events were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 76 episodes of insulin underdelivery that occurred during the study, resulting in an incidence of 74 events per 100 patient-years. Of 52 NaOH pump rinses, 30 restored normal flow rate. Surgery, performed after rinse failure (n = 22) or as the first step (n = 24), disclosed catheter blockages due to tip obstructions in 28 cases and omental encapsulations in 18 other cases. Five combined severe reductions of pump flow rate requiring pump replacements were diagnosed during surgery, and additional NaOH rinses had to be performed after catheter change in 12 other cases. Analysis of the incidence of underdelivery events indicated that both pump- and catheter-related problems were significantly increased while implanted systems infused batches B, C, and D versus batch A (P < 0.01), whereas the duration of pump implantation had no significant influence. CONCLUSIONS: Underdelivery events constitute serious limiting obstacles to prolonged peritoneal insulin infusion from implanted pumps. Progress in insulin pump compatibility is expected to reduce their occurrence and, thus, to improve the feasibility of this treatment.
CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Renard, I. Raingeard, G. Costalat, D. Apostol, D. Lauton, F. Boulet, and J. Bringer Aseptic Peritonitis Revealed Through Recurrent Catheter Obstructions in Type 1 Diabetic Patients Treated with Continuous Peritoneal Insulin Infusion Diabetes Care, January 1, 2004; 27(1): 276 - 277. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Jeandidier, S. Boullu, M.-S. Busch-Brafin, G. Chabrier, R. Sapin, F. Gasser, and M. Pinget Comparison of Antigenicity of Hoechst 21PH Insulin Using Either Implantable Intraperitoneal Pump or Subcutaneous External Pump Infusion in Type 1 Diabetic Patients Diabetes Care, January 1, 2002; 25(1): 84 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]