Diabetes Care, Vol 19, Issue 9 927-933, Copyright © 1996 by American Diabetes Association

ARTICLES

A comprehensive assessment of the avoidability of long-term complications of diabetes. A case-control study. SID-AMD Italian Study Group for the Implementation of the St. Vincent Declaration

A Nicolucci, D Cavaliere, N Scorpiglione, F Carinci, F Capani, G Tognoni and MM Benedetti
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Epidemiology, University of Chieti, Italy. nicolucci@cmns.mnegri.it

OBJECTIVE: To identify and quantify risk factors for the development of long-term diabetic complications (i.e., critical limb ischemia, amputation, chronic renal failure [creatinine > 3 mg/dl], dialysis treatment, proliferative retinopathy, blindness), with particular emphasis on those variables that, being related to quality of care, can be considered avoidable. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We designed a case-control study that enrolled 886 patients with long-term diabetic complications and 1,888 control subjects without complications from 35 diabetic outpatient clinics and 49 general practitioners offices during a 6-month period. Selected socioeconomic, pathophysiologic, self-care, health care, and lifestyle information were collected for all patients. RESULTS: A logistic regression analysis showed that several factors are related to the development of major diabetic complications. Among patient characteristics, male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.3) and age (OR = 1.7, 95% Cl 1.2-2.4 for patients between 50 and 69 years of age as opposed to those younger than 50 years of age) were associated with an increased risk of complication. Among clinical variables, the type and the duration of diabetes were the most important predictors of diabetic complications. The presence of hypertension was also associated with the development of diabetic complications, particularly when it was poorly controlled by treatment (OR = 3.1, 95% CI 2.3-4.3). Patients who needed help to reach a health care facility and those who did not regularly attend such a facility were at higher risk of developing complications (OR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9; OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.2, respectively). Educational aspects were also related to the outcome: patients who did not receive any kind of educational intervention had an increased risk of developing complications (OR = 4.1, 95% CI 1.7-9.7), while self-management of insulin therapy had a protective effect (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.8). The summary attributable risk related to avoidable risk factors (i.e., uncontrolled hypertension, poor compliance with visit scheduling, inadequate diabetes education, no self-management of insulin treatment) was 0.39. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that, by removing avoidable risk factors, the number of diabetic complications considered could be reduced by more than one-third. The case-control methodology represents an efficient way of monitoring clinical practice and relating it to important outcomes. It can be of help for policy makers in identifying the more effective strategies and in tailoring specific interventions aimed at improving the quality of the care delivered to diabetic patients.
CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. L. Finucane and C. K. McMullen Making Diabetes Self-management Education Culturally Relevant for Filipino Americans in Hawaii The Diabetes Educator, September 1, 2008; 34(5): 841 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Boren, T. L. Gunlock, J. Schaefer, and A. Albright Reducing Risks in Diabetes Self-management: A Systematic Review of the Literature The Diabetes Educator, November 1, 2007; 33(6): 1053 - 1077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. G. Bradshaw, G. E. Richardson, and K. Kulkarni Thriving With Diabetes: An Introduction to the Resiliency Approach for Diabetes Educators The Diabetes Educator, July 1, 2007; 33(4): 643 - 649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Mensing, J. Boucher, M. Cypress, K. Weinger, K. Mulcahy, P. Barta, G. Hosey, W. Kopher, A. Lasichak, B. Lamb, et al. National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education Diabetes Care, January 1, 2007; 30(suppl_1): S96 - S103. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Suhl and P. Bonsignore Diabetes Self-Management Education for Older Adults: General Principles and Practical Application Diabetes Spectr, October 1, 2006; 19(4): 234 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Mensing, J. Boucher, M. Cypress, K. Weinger, K. Mulcahy, P. Barta, G. Hosey, W. Kopher, A. Lasichak, B. Lamb, et al. National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education Diabetes Care, January 1, 2006; 29(suppl_1): S78 - S85. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Bell, T. A. Arcury, B. M. Snively, S. L. Smith, J. M. Stafford, R. Dohanish, and S. A. Quandt Diabetes Foot Self-care Practices in a Rural, Triethnic Population The Diabetes Educator, January 1, 2005; 31(1): 75 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Mensing, J. Boucher, M. Cypress, K. Weinger, K. Mulcahy, P. Barta, G. Hosey, W. Kopher, A. Lasichak, B. Lamb, et al. National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education Diabetes Care, January 1, 2005; 28(suppl_1): S72 - S79. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Koro, S. J. Bowlin, N. Bourgeois, and D. O. Fedder Glycemic Control From 1988 to 2000 Among U.S. Adults Diagnosed With Type 2 Diabetes: A preliminary report Diabetes Care, January 1, 2004; 27(1): 17 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Mensing, J. Boucher, M. Cypress, K. Weinger, K. Mulcahy, P. Barta, G. Hosey, W. Kopher, A. Lasichak, B. Lamb, et al. National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education Diabetes Care, January 1, 2004; 27(90001): s143 - 143. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Dolder, J. P. Lacro, and D. V. Jeste Adherence to Antipsychotic and Nonpsychiatric Medications in Middle-Aged and Older Patients With Psychotic Disorders Psychosom Med, January 1, 2003; 65(1): 156 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Mensing, J. Boucher, M. Cypress, K. Weinger, K. Mulcahy, P. Barta, G. Hosey, W. Kopher, A. Lasichak, B. Lamb, et al. National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education Diabetes Care, January 1, 2003; 26(90001): s149 - 156. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Tamblyn, M. Abrahamowicz, W. D. Dauphinee, J. A. Hanley, J. Norcini, N. Girard, P. Grand'Maison, and C. Brailovsky Association Between Licensure Examination Scores and Practice in Primary Care JAMA, December 18, 2002; 288(23): 3019 - 3026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. B. Laditka, M. P. Mastanduno, and J. N. Laditka Health Care Use of Individuals With Diabetes in an Employer-Based Insurance Population Arch Intern Med, May 28, 2001; 161(10): 1301 - 1308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Mensing, J. Boucher, M. Cypress, K. Weinger, K. Mulcahy, P. Barta, O. Hosey, W. Kopher, A. Lasichak, B. Lamb, et al. National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education The Diabetes Educator, July 1, 2000; 26(4): 611 - 626. [PDF]

				S. A. Brown, R. B. Harrist, E. T. Villagomez, M. Segura, S. A. Barton, and C. L. Hanis Gender and Treatment Differences in Knowledge, Health Beliefs, and Metabolic Control in Mexican Americans With Type 2 Diabetes The Diabetes Educator, May 1, 2000; 26(3): 425 - 438. [PDF]

				H. E. Resnick, P. Valsania, and C. L. Phillips Diabetes Mellitus and Nontraumatic Lower Extremity Amputation in Black and White Americans: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study, 1971-1992 Arch Intern Med, November 8, 1999; 159(20): 2470 - 2475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Brown Interventions to Promote Diabetes Self-Management: State of the Science The Diabetes Educator, November 1, 1999; 25(6_suppl): 52 - 61. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Tamblyn, M. Abrahamowicz, C. Brailovsky, P. Grand'Maison, J. Lescop, J. Norcini, N. Girard, and J. Haggerty Association Between Licensing Examination Scores and Resource Use and Quality of Care in Primary Care Practice JAMA, September 16, 1998; 280(11): 989 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]