Diabetes Care, Vol 21, Issue 10 1596-1602, Copyright © 1998 by American Diabetes Association

ARTICLES

The Veterans Affairs Implantable Insulin Pump Study: effect on cardiovascular risk factors

WC Duckworth, CD Saudek, A Giobbie-Hurder, WG Henderson, RR Henry, DE Kelley, SV Edelman, FJ Zieve, RA Adler, JW Anderson, RJ Anderson, BP Hamilton, TW Donner, MS Kirkman and NA Morgan
Omaha Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Nebraska, USA. wduckwor@unmc.edu

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether implantable insulin pump (IIP) and multiple-dose insulin (MDI) therapy have different effects on cardiovascular risk factors in insulin-requiring patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted at seven Veterans Affairs medical centers in 121 male patients with type 2 diabetes between the ages of 40 and 69 years receiving at least one injection of insulin per day and with HbA1c, levels of > or =8% at baseline. Weights, blood pressures, insulin use, and glucose monitoring data were obtained at each visit. Lipid levels were obtained at 0, 4, 8, and 12 months, and free and total insulin levels were obtained at 0, 6, and 12 months. All medications being taken were recorded at each visit. RESULTS: No difference in absolute blood pressure, neither systolic nor diastolic, was seen between patients receiving MDI or IIP therapy, but significantly more MDI patients required anti-hypertensive medications. When blood pressure was modeled against weight and time, IIP therapy was significantly better than MDI therapy for systolic blood pressure in patients with BMI <33 and for diastolic blood pressure in patients with BMI >34 kg/m2. Total cholesterol levels decreased in the overall sample, but IIP patients exhibited significantly higher levels than MDI patients. Triglyceride levels increased over time for both groups, with IIP patients having significantly higher levels than patients in the MDI group. BMI was a significant predictor of, and inversely proportional to, HDL cholesterol level. No difference in lipid-lowering drug therapy was seen between the two groups. Free insulin and insulin antibodies tended to decrease in the IIP group as compared with the MDI group. C-peptide levels decreased in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: IIP therapy in insulin-requiring patients with type 2 diabetes has advantages over MDI therapy in decreasing the requirement for antihypertensive therapy and for decreasing total and free insulin and insulin antibodies. Both therapies reduce total cholesterol and C-peptide levels.
CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. E. Fineberg, T. T. Kawabata, D. Finco-Kent, R. J. Fountaine, G. L. Finch, and A. S. Krasner Immunological Responses to Exogenous Insulin Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2007; 28(6): 625 - 652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Jeandidier, S. Boullu, M.-S. Busch-Brafin, G. Chabrier, R. Sapin, F. Gasser, and M. Pinget Comparison of Antigenicity of Hoechst 21PH Insulin Using Either Implantable Intraperitoneal Pump or Subcutaneous External Pump Infusion in Type 1 Diabetic Patients Diabetes Care, January 1, 2002; 25(1): 84 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Vajo, J. Fawcett, and W. C. Duckworth Recombinant DNA Technology in the Treatment of Diabetes: Insulin Analogs Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2001; 22(5): 706 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. C. Duckworth, M. McCarren, and C. Abraira Glucose Control and Cardiovascular Complications: The VA Diabetes Trial Diabetes Care, May 1, 2001; 24(5): 942 - 945. [Full Text]