|
Diabetes Care, Vol 21, Issue 3 336-340, Copyright © 1998 by American Diabetes Association
Variation of postprandial plasma glucose, palatability, and symptoms associated with a standardized mixed test meal versus 75 g oral glucose
TM Wolever, JL Chiasson, A Csima, JA Hunt, C Palmason, SA Ross and EA Ryan
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Univeristy of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. thomas.wolever@utoronto.ca
OBJECTIVE: To compare within-subject variability of plasma glucose measured
2 h after a glucose tolerance test (GTT) with that of plasma glucose
measured 2 h after administration of a standardized test meal (diabetes
screening product [DSP], Ceapro, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) and to
determine the relationship between the two sets of plasma glucose
measurements. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Plasma glucose and insulin
responses of 36 overnight-fasted subjects (10 lean normal, 9 obese normal,
9 with impaired glucose tolerance [IGT], and 8 with mild diabetes) were
studied on eight different mornings after they consumed 75 g oral glucose
or 50 g carbohydrate from the DSP. Each test meal was repeated four times
by each subject. Within-subject coefficients of variation (CVs) (CV = 100 x
SD/mean) of plasma glucose concentrations 2 h after administration of the
GTT and DSP were compared by repeated measures ANOVA and linear regression
analysis. RESULTS: Mean plasma glucose 2 h after administration of the DSP
(D) was linearly related to that 2 h after the GTT (G): G = 1.5 x D - 1.6
(r = 0.97, P < 0.0001). The CV of 2-h plasma glucose was significantly
lower after administration of the DSP, 10.5 +/- 1.0%, than after the GTT,
12.7 +/- 1.18% (P = 0.025). The effect of test meal on CV differed in
different groups of subjects (P = 0.018), with the largest difference found
in IGT subjects, in whom the CV after DSP administration was 47% less than
after the GTT (P = 0.0005). The DSP was significantly more palatable and
produced fewer adverse symptoms than the GTT. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma glucose
concentrations measured 2 h after DSP administration are closely related to
those measured 2 h after the GTT but are more consistent than the 2-h
post-GTT concentrations within the critical IGT range. This finding
suggests that measurement of plasma glucose 2 h after administration of the
DSP may allow more precise discrimination among normal glucose levels, IGT,
and diabetes than measurement of plasma glucose 2 h after the GTT.

CiteULike Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L Pearce, M. Noakes, J. Keogh, and P. M Clifton
Effect of carbohydrate distribution on postprandial glucose peaks with the use of continuous glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition,
March 1, 2008;
87(3):
638 - 644.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Peter and A. Rees
Review: Postprandial glycaemia and cardiovascular risk
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease,
January 1, 2008;
8(1):
8 - 14.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Giugliano, A. Ceriello, and K. Esposito
Glucose metabolism and hyperglycemia
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition,
January 1, 2008;
87(1):
217S - 222S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Dailey
Assessing Glycemic Control With Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose and Hemoglobin A1c Measurements
Mayo Clin. Proc.,
February 1, 2007;
82(2):
229 - 236.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ceriello, D. Johns, M. Widel, D. J. Eckland, K. J. Gilmore, and M. H. Tan
Comparison of Effect of Pioglitazone With Metformin or Sulfonylurea (Monotherapy and Combination Therapy) on Postload Glycemia and Composite Insulin Sensitivity Index During an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care,
February 1, 2005;
28(2):
266 - 272.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ceriello
Postprandial Hyperglycemia and Diabetes Complications: Is It Time to Treat?
Diabetes,
January 1, 2005;
54(1):
1 - 7.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ceriello, M. Hanefeld, L. Leiter, L. Monnier, A. Moses, D. Owens, N. Tajima, J. Tuomilehto, and for the International Prandial Glucose Regulation
Postprandial Glucose Regulation and Diabetic Complications
Arch Intern Med,
October 25, 2004;
164(19):
2090 - 2095.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Golay, C. Guitard, M. Hoyer, J. O Logan, and P. C Brunel
Assessment of postprandial glucose: relationship between a standardised continental breakfast and the oral glucose tolerance test
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease,
September 1, 2004;
4(5):
321 - 324.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Mohanlal and R. R. Holman
A Standardized Triglyceride and Carbohydrate Challenge: The oral triglyceride tolerance test
Diabetes Care,
January 1, 2004;
27(1):
89 - 94.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Ihlemann, C. Rask-Madsen, A. Perner, H. Dominguez, T. Hermann, L. Kober, and C. Torp-Pedersen
Tetrahydrobiopterin restores endothelial dysfunction induced by an oral glucose challenge in healthy subjects
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
July 11, 2003;
285(2):
H875 - H882.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Diabetes Association.
|
|
| |
|