|
Diabetes Care, Vol 21, Issue 4 585-590, Copyright © 1998 by American Diabetes Association
Validation of home blood glucose meters with respect to clinical and analytical approaches
GA Brunner, M Ellmerer, G Sendlhofer, A Wutte, Z Trajanoski, L Schaupp, F Quehenberger, P Wach, GJ Krejs and TR Pieber
Department of Internal Medicine, Karl Franzens University Graz, Austria.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and analytical accuracy of home blood
glucose meters. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Six blood glucose
meters--Reflolux S (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany), One Touch II
(LifeScan, Milpitas, CA), Glucocard Memory (Menarini, Florence, Italy),
Precision QID (Medisense, Cambridge, U.K.), HaemoCue (HaemoCue, Angelholm,
Sweden), and Accutrend alpha (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany)--were
compared with a reference method (Beckman Glucose Analyzer II) under
controlled conditions (glucose clamp technique). Validation of the blood
glucose meters was accomplished by clinically oriented approaches (error
grid analysis), statistical approaches (variance components analysis), and
by the criteria of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), which recommend
a target variability of < 5%. RESULTS: A total of 1,794 blood glucose
monitor readings and 299 reference values ranging from 2.2 to 18.2 mmol/l
were analyzed (705 readings < 3.89 mmol/l, 839 readings between 3.89 and
9.99 mmol/l, and 250 readings > 9.99 mmol/l). According to error grid
analysis, only Reflolux S and Glucocard M had 100% of estimations within
the clinically acceptable zones A and B. Assessment of analytical accuracy
revealed substantial differences between the glucose meters after
separation of the data into defined glycemic ranges. None of the devices
met the ADA criteria. CONCLUSIONS: To evaluate accuracy of blood glucose
meters, error grid analysis, as well as statistical models, are helpful
means and should be performed together. Analytical performance of currently
available home blood glucose meters differs substantially within defined
glycemic ranges.

CiteULike Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Anzalone
Equivalence of Earlobe Site Blood Glucose Testing With Finger Stick
Clin Nurs Res,
November 1, 2008;
17(4):
251 - 261.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-H. Wu, M.-Y. Fang, L.-N. Jen, H.-C. Hsiao, A. Muller, and C.-T. Hsu
Clinical Evaluation of Bionime Rightest GM310 Biosensors with a Simplified Electrode Fabrication for Alternative-Site Blood Glucose Tests
Clin. Chem.,
October 1, 2008;
54(10):
1689 - 1695.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. D. Saudek, R. L. Derr, and R. R. Kalyani
Assessing Glycemia in Diabetes Using Self-monitoring Blood Glucose and Hemoglobin A1c
JAMA,
April 12, 2006;
295(14):
1688 - 1697.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. L. Clarke, S. Anderson, L. Farhy, M. Breton, L. Gonder-Frederick, D. Cox, and B. Kovatchev
Evaluating the Clinical Accuracy of Two Continuous Glucose Sensors Using Continuous Glucose-Error Grid Analysis
Diabetes Care,
October 1, 2005;
28(10):
2412 - 2417.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D M Stork, H. Kemperman, D W. Erkelens, and T. F Veneman
Comparison of the accuracy of the hemocue glucose analyzer with the Yellow Springs Instrument glucose oxidase analyzer, particularly in hypoglycemia
Eur. J. Endocrinol.,
August 1, 2005;
153(2):
275 - 281.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. C. Klonoff
The Need for Separate Performance Goals for Glucose Sensors in the Hypoglycemic, Normoglycemic, and Hyperglycemic Ranges
Diabetes Care,
March 1, 2004;
27(3):
834 - 836.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Bohme, M. Floriot, M.-A. Sirveaux, D. Durain, O. Ziegler, P. Drouin, and B. Guerci
Evolution of Analytical Performance in Portable Glucose Meters in the Last Decade
Diabetes Care,
April 1, 2003;
26(4):
1170 - 1175.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Skeie, G. Thue, K. Nerhus, and S. Sandberg
Instruments for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: Comparisons of Testing Quality Achieved by Patients and a Technician
Clin. Chem.,
July 1, 2002;
48(7):
994 - 1003.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. B. Sacks, D. E. Bruns, D. E. Goldstein, N. K. Maclaren, J. M. McDonald, and M. Parrott
Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus
Clin. Chem.,
March 1, 2002;
48(3):
436 - 472.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Henry, C. A. Major, and S. Reinsch
Accuracy of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: Impact on Diabetes Management Decisions During Pregnancy
The Diabetes Educator,
July 1, 2001;
27(4):
521 - 529.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. R. McAnulty, H. J. Robertshaw, and G. M. Hall
Anaesthetic management of patients with diabetes mellitus
Br. J. Anaesth.,
July 1, 2000;
85(1):
80 - 90.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Weitgasser, B. Gappmayer, and M. Pichler
Newer Portable Glucose Meters--Analytical Improvement Compared with Previous Generation Devices?
Clin. Chem.,
October 1, 1999;
45(10):
1821 - 1825.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Diabetes Association.
|
|
| |
|