Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Naessens, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Naessens, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 21, Issue 6 972-976, Copyright © 1998 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Impact of a diabetes electronic management system on the care of patients seen in a subspecialty diabetes clinic

SA Smith, ME Murphy, TR Huschka, SF Dinneen, CA Gorman, BR Zimmerman, RA Rizza and JM Naessens
Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. smith.steven@mayo.edu

OBJECTIVE: To compare the compliance with diabetes care performance indicators by diabetes specialists using a diabetes electronic management system (DEMS) and by those using the traditional paper medical record. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A DEMS has been gradually introduced into our subspecialty practice for diabetes care. To assess the value of this DEMS as a disease management tool, we completed a retrospective review of the medical records of 82 randomly selected patients attending a subspecialty diabetes clinic (DC) during the first quarter of 1996. Eligible patients were defined by the suggested criteria from the American Diabetes Association Provider Recognition Program. During the first quarter of 1996, approximately one half of the providers began using the DEMS for some but not all of their patient encounters. Neither abstractors nor providers were aware of the intent to examine performance in relationship to use of the DEMS. RESULTS: Several measures were positively influenced when providers used the DEMS. The number of foot examinations, the number of blood pressure readings, and a weighted criterion score were greater (P < 0.01) for providers using the DEMS. There was evidence, although not statistically significant, for lower mean diastolic blood pressures (P = 0.043) in patients and for number of glycated hemoglobins documented (P = 0.018) by users of the DEMS. CONCLUSIONS: Performance and documentation of the process of care for patients with diabetes in a subspecialty clinic are greater with the use of a DEMS than with the traditional paper record.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
D. C. Kendrick, D. Bu, E. Pan, and B. Middleton
Crossing the Evidence Chasm: Building Evidence Bridges from Process Changes to Clinical Outcomes
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2007; 14(3): 329 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
J.-H. Cho, S.-A. Chang, H.-S. Kwon, Y.-H. Choi, S.-H. Ko, S.-D. Moon, S.-J. Yoo, K.-H. Song, H.-S. Son, H.-S. Kim, et al.
Long-Term Effect of the Internet-Based Glucose Monitoring System on HbA1c Reduction and Glucose Stability: A 30-month follow-up study for diabetes management with a ubiquitous medical care system
Diabetes Care, December 1, 2006; 29(12): 2625 - 2631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
K. G. Shojania, S. R. Ranji, K. M. McDonald, J. M. Grimshaw, V. Sundaram, R. J. Rushakoff, and D. K. Owens
Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis.
JAMA, July 26, 2006; 296(4): 427 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
S. T. Rosenbloom, K.-W. Chiu, D. W. Byrne, D. A. Talbert, E. G. Neilson, and R. A. Miller
Interventions to Regulate Ordering of Serum Magnesium Levels: Report of an Unintended Consequence of Decision Support
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2005; 12(5): 546 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
S. T. Rosenbloom, A. J. Geissbuhler, W. D. Dupont, D. A. Giuse, D. A. Talbert, W. M. Tierney, W. D. Plummer, W. W. Stead, and R. A. Miller
Effect of CPOE User Interface Design on User-Initiated Access to Educational and Patient Information during Clinical Care
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2005; 12(4): 458 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
S. T. Rosenbloom, J. Grande, A. Geissbuhler, and R. A. Miller
Experience in Implementing Inpatient Clinical Note Capture via a Provider Order Entry System
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2004; 11(4): 310 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
H.-S. Kwon, J.-H. Cho, H.-S. Kim, B.-R. Song, S.-H. Ko, J.-M. Lee, S.-R. Kim, S.-A. Chang, H.-S. Kim, B.-Y. Cha, et al.
Establishment of Blood Glucose Monitoring System Using the Internet
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2004; 27(2): 478 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
J. East, P. Krishnamurthy, B. Freed, and G. Nosovitski
Impact of a Diabetes Electronic Management System on Patient Care in a Community Clinic
American Journal of Medical Quality, July 1, 2003; 18(4): 150 - 154.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. B. Davidson
The Case for "Outsourcing" Diabetes Care
Diabetes Care, May 1, 2003; 26(5): 1608 - 1612.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
J. B. Meigs, E. Cagliero, A. Dubey, P. Murphy-Sheehy, C. Gildesgame, H. Chueh, M. J. Barry, D. E. Singer, and D. M. Nathan
A Controlled Trial of Web-Based Diabetes Disease Management: The MGH Diabetes Primary Care Improvement Project
Diabetes Care, March 1, 2003; 26(3): 750 - 757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
T. S. Harwell, J. M. McDowall, D. Gohdes, S. D. Helgerson, and Montana Diabetes Health Center Team
Measuring and Improving Preventive Care for Patients With Diabetes in Primary Health Centers
American Journal of Medical Quality, September 1, 2002; 17(5): 179 - 184.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
K. L. Stoner, N. J. Lasar, M. K. Butcher, L. M. Fawcett, M. E. Danelson, T. S. Harwell, and S. D. Helgerson
Improving Glycemic Control: Can Techniques Used in a Managed Care Setting Be Successfully Adapted to a Rural Fee-for-Service Practice?
American Journal of Medical Quality, May 1, 2001; 16(3): 93 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Diabetes EducatorHome page
R. E. Glasgow, S. M. Boles, D. Calder, L. Dreyer, and J. Bagdade
Diabetes Care Practices in Primary Care: Results from Two Samples and Three Measurement Sets
The Diabetes Educator, September 1, 1999; 25(5): 755 - 763.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1998 by the American Diabetes Association.