Diabetes Care, Vol 21, Issue 6 983-986, Copyright © 1998 by American Diabetes Association
Effects of sickle cell trait and hemoglobin C trait on determinations of HbA1c by an immunoassay method
WL Roberts, M McCraw and CB Cook
Department of Pathology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216, USA. wroberts@pathology.umsmed.edu
OBJECTIVE: A number of studies, including the Diabetes Control and
Complications Trial (DCCT), have shown that good glycemic control, as
assessed by GHb measurements, can reduce the chronic complications of
diabetes. The National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) was
established to insure that GHb measurements by different methods were
comparable and could be related to the candidate reference method used in
the DCCT. The measurement of HbA1c in patients with Hb variants is one area
not directly addressed by the NGSP. Therefore, we assessed the
comparability of two DCCT-traceable methods in samples with Hb variants.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Samples containing HbAA, HbAC, and HbAS were
collected from diabetic and nondiabetic patients. HbA1c concentrations were
measured by a high-performance liquid chromatography method (Bio-Rad
Diamat) and an immunoassay that is suitable for use in a physician's office
(Bayer DCA 2000). RESULTS: The two methods compared well for samples with
HbAA and HbAS. However, for samples containing HbAC the immunoassay method
showed relative positive biases of 8.4 and 10.4% at HbA1c levels of 7 and
9%, respectively, such that the two methods would not be judged comparable
according to NGSP guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The DCA 2000 HbA1c immunoassay
method showed significant positive bias in patients with HbC trait. One
possible clinical implication of this overestimation is overly rigorous
glycemic control with a concomitant increase in hypoglycemia. This may be
especially important in certain ethnic populations, such as
African-Americans, who have a relatively high prevalence of HbC trait.