Diabetes Care, Vol 21, Issue 8 1221-1225, Copyright © 1998 by American Diabetes Association

ARTICLES

Combined use of a fasting plasma glucose concentration and HbA1c or fructosamine predicts the likelihood of having diabetes in high-risk subjects

GT Ko, JC Chan, VT Yeung, CC Chow, LW Tsang, JK Li, WY So, HP Wai and CS Cockram
Department of Medicine, Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital, Tai Po, Hong Kong, China.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of using fasting plasma glucose (FPG) concentrations in conjunction with HbA1c or fructosamine for the screening of diabetes in high-risk individuals. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this study 2,877 Hong Kong Chinese (565 [19.6%] men; 2,312 [80.4%] women) with various risk factors for glucose intolerance underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for screening of diabetes. The risk factors included a family history positive for diabetes, a history of gestational diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance, and obesity. RESULTS: Using World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, 1,593 (55.4%) had normal glucose tolerance, 657 (22.8%) had impaired glucose tolerance, and 627 (21.8%) had diabetes. When the 1997 American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria were applied, 394 (13.7%) had diabetes with an FPG > or = 7.0 mmol/l. Using multiple receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the paired values of an FPG of 5.6 mmol/l and a HbA1c of 5.5% gave an optimal sensitivity of 83.8% and specificity of 83.6% to predict a 2-h plasma glucose (PG) > or = 11.1 mmol/l. Likewise, the paired values of an FPG of 5.4 mmol/l and a fructosamine level of 235 mumol/l (n = 2,408) gave an optimal sensitivity of 81.5% and specificity of 83.2%. An FPG > or = 5.6 mmol/l and an HbA1c > or = 5.5% was 5.4-fold more likely to occur in diabetic subjects (based on the WHO criteria) compared with nondiabetic subjects. For paired parameters less than these values, the likelihood ratio of this occurring in diabetic subjects was only 0.11. Similarly, an FPG > or = 5.4 mmol/l and a fructosamine > or = 235 mumol/l was fivefold more likely to occur in diabetic subjects than in nondiabetic subjects, with both parameters less than these values having a likelihood ratio of 0.04. Using these paired values as initial screening tests, only subjects who had an FPG > or = 5.6 mmol/l and < 7.8 mmol/l and an HbA1c > or = 5.5% (n = 642) required an OGTT to confirm diabetes, thereby saving 77.7% [(2,877-642)/2,877] of the OGTTs performed. Similarly, only subjects who had an FPG > or = 5.4 mmol/l and < 7.8 mmol/l and a fructosamine > or = 235 mumol/l (n = 526) required OGTT to confirm diabetes, meaning that 78.2% [(2,408-526)/2,408] of the OGTTs could have been saved. Based on the 1997 ADA criterion of an FPG cutoff value of 7.0 mmol/l, the corresponding numbers of OGTTs to be saved were 82.6% and 85.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The paired values of FPG and HbA1c or FPG and fructosamine helped to identify potentially diabetic subjects, the diagnosis of which could be further confirmed by the 75-g OGTT. Using this approach approximately 80% of OGTTs could have been saved, depending on the diagnostic cutoff value of FPG.
CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Likhari, T S Aulakh, B. M Singh, and R Gama Does HbA1C predict isolated impaired fasting glycaemia in the oral glucose tolerance test in subjects with impaired fasting glycaemia? Ann Clin Biochem, July 1, 2008; 45(4): 418 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Doi, M. Kubo, T. Ninomiya, K. Yonemoto, M. Iwase, H. Arima, J. Hata, Y. Tanizaki, M. Iida, and Y. Kiyohara Impact of Kir6.2 E23K Polymorphism on the Development of Type 2 Diabetes in a General Japanese Population: The Hisayama Study Diabetes, November 1, 2007; 56(11): 2829 - 2833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Bergeron, J. Yao, J. W. Woods, E. I. Zycband, C. Liu, Z. Li, A. Adams, J. P. Berger, B. B. Zhang, D. E. Moller, et al. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR)-{alpha} Agonism Prevents the Onset of Type 2 Diabetes in Zucker Diabetic Fatty Rats: A Comparison with PPAR{gamma} Agonism Endocrinology, September 1, 2006; 147(9): 4252 - 4262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Shaw, P. Z. Zimmet, and K. G. M.M. Alberti Point: Impaired Fasting Glucose: The Case for the New American Diabetes Association Criterion Diabetes Care, May 1, 2006; 29(5): 1170 - 1172. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classificati Follow-up Report on the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Clin. Diabetes, April 1, 2004; 22(2): 71 - 79. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Colagiuri, Z. Hussain, P. Zimmet, A. Cameron, and J. Shaw Screening for Type 2 Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Metabolism: The Australian experience Diabetes Care, February 1, 2004; 27(2): 367 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Follow-up Report on the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Spectr, January 1, 2004; 17(1): 51 - 59. [Full Text] [PDF]

				The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classifi Follow-up Report on the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Care, November 1, 2003; 26(11): 3160 - 3167. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S. Anand, F. Razak, V. Vuksan, H. C. Gerstein, K. Malmberg, Q. Yi, K. K. Teo, and S. Yusuf Diagnostic Strategies to Detect Glucose Intolerance in a Multiethnic Population Diabetes Care, February 1, 2003; 26(2): 290 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Krishnamurti and M. W. Steffes Glycohemoglobin: A Primary Predictor of the Development or Reversal of Complications of Diabetes Mellitus Clin. Chem., July 1, 2001; 47(7): 1157 - 1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Perry, R. R. Shankar, N. Fineberg, J. McGill, and A. D. Baron HbA1c Measurement Improves the Detection of Type 2 Diabetes in High-Risk Individuals With Nondiagnostic Levels of Fasting Plasma Glucose: The Early Diabetes Intervention Program (EDIP) Diabetes Care, March 1, 2001; 24(3): 465 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text]