Diabetes Care, Vol 21, Issue 9 1475-1480, Copyright © 1998 by American Diabetes Association

ARTICLES

Comparison of percent total GHb with percent HbA1c in people with and without known diabetes

FQ Nuttall
Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, 55417, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To directly compare results obtained using an ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) HbA1c method used in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial with two different affinity chromatography methods in which "total GHb" is determined. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood was obtained from a large number of people with and without known diabetes. The specimens were divided and assayed for HbA1c and for total GHb. Total GHb was determined using a semi-automated gravity-elution boronate affinity chromatography method and an automated boronate affinity HPLC method. The results obtained with the two methods were also compared. RESULTS: In subjects without known diabetes, the mean percentage HbA1c and the range of values were similar to the total GHb values in the same subjects when assayed using the semi-automated affinity gravity-elution method (mean 5.2 +/- 0.4 and 5.1 +/- 0.4% [SD], respectively). With the affinity HPLC method, results were 5.3 +/- 0.4%. The similarity in results was surprising. However, analysis of the data suggests that a large proportion of the material in the HbA1c fraction measured using this ion-exchange HPLC method is not GHb, as pointed out by others. Although the results were similar in people without known diabetes, in the people with diabetes, the incremental increase was approximately 25% greater for the total GHb when compared with the increase in HbA1c. When corrected for the non-GHb being measured by the HbA1c method, it can be calculated that approximately 40% more GHb is measured using affinity chromatography over the entire range of GHb values. CONCLUSIONS: The similarity in the mean and range of percent HbA1c and in percent total GHb using these different methods can be attributed to two factors: 1) the HbA1c ion-exchange method measures only approximately 50-60% of the total GHb present, and 2) approximately 40-50% of the material being measured in the HbA1c fraction is not GHb, i.e., offsetting factors fortuitously resulted in values similar to the more specific affinity methods. The greater incremental increase in percent total GHb compared with percent HbA1c in people with diabetes can be attributed to the greater amount of GHb being measured with the affinity methods.
CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. G. Han, C.-M. Hao, E. E. Tchekneva, Y.-Y. Wang, C. A. Lee, B. Ebrahim, R. C. Harris, T. S. Kern, D. H. Wasserman, M. D. Breyer, et al. Markers of glycemic control in the mouse: comparisons of 6-h- and overnight-fasted blood glucoses to Hb A1c Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2008; 295(4): E981 - E986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. R. Little, C. L. Rohlfing, S. Hanson, S. Connolly, T. Higgins, C. W. Weykamp, M. D'Costa, V. Luzzi, W. E. Owen, and W. L. Roberts Effects of Hemoglobin (Hb) E and HbD Traits on Measurements of Glycated Hb (HbA1c) by 23 Methods Clin. Chem., August 1, 2008; 54(8): 1277 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Q. Nuttall Evidence for Independent Heritability of the Glycation Gap (Glycosylation Gap) Fraction of HbA1c in Nondiabetic Twins: Response to Cohen et al. Diabetes Care, April 1, 2007; 30(4): e14 - e14. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. R. Little, H. Vesper, C. L. Rohlfing, M. Ospina, S. Safar-Pour, and W. L. Roberts Validation by a Mass Spectrometric Reference Method of Use of Boronate Affinity Chromatography to Measure Glycohemoglobin in the Presence of Hemoglobin S and C Traits Clin. Chem., January 1, 2005; 51(1): 264 - 265. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Gannon and F. Q. Nuttall Effect of a High-Protein, Low-Carbohydrate Diet on Blood Glucose Control in People With Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes, September 1, 2004; 53(9): 2375 - 2382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C Gannon, F. Q Nuttall, A. Saeed, K. Jordan, and H. Hoover An increase in dietary protein improves the blood glucose response in persons with type 2 diabetes Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2003; 78(4): 734 - 741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. L. Roberts, B. K. De, D. Brown, C. M. Hanbury, J. D. Hoyer, W. G. John, T. L. Lambert, R. B. Lundell, C. Rohlfing, and R. R. Little Effects of Hemoglobin C and S Traits on Eight Glycohemoglobin Methods Clin. Chem., February 1, 2002; 48(2): 383 - 385. [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Krishnamurti and M. W. Steffes Glycohemoglobin: A Primary Predictor of the Development or Reversal of Complications of Diabetes Mellitus Clin. Chem., July 1, 2001; 47(7): 1157 - 1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L.-Y. Tsai, S.-M. Tsai, M.-N. Lin, and S.-F. Liu Effect of Hemoglobin Variants (Hb J, Hb G, and Hb E) on HbA1c Values as Measured by Cation-Exchange HPLC (Diamat) Clin. Chem., April 1, 2001; 47(4): 756 - 758. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Bry, P. C. Chen, and D. B. Sacks Effects of Hemoglobin Variants and Chemically Modified Derivatives on Assays for Glycohemoglobin Clin. Chem., February 1, 2001; 47(2): 153 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z.K. Shihabi, R.P. Schwartz, and M.J. Pugia Decreasing the Variability Observed in Urine Analysis Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2001; 31(1): 99 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Frank, L. Moulton, R. R. Little, H.-M. Wiedmeyer, C. Rohlfing, and W. L. Roberts Effects of Hemoglobin C and S Traits on Seven Glycohemoglobin Methods Clin. Chem., June 1, 2000; 46(6): 864 - 867. [Full Text] [PDF]