Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Alberti, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Alberti, K. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 23, Issue 1 34-39, Copyright © 2000 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Impaired fasting glucose: how low should it go?

JE Shaw, PZ Zimmet, AM Hodge, M de Courten, GK Dowse, P Chitson, J Tuomilehto and KG Alberti
International Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia. jshotham@hotmail.com

OBJECTIVE: Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) has been recently introduced as a stage of abnormal carbohydrate metabolism, but the evidence on which its glucose limits (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] 6.1-6.9 mmol/l) are based is not strong. The aim of this study was to determine if 6.1 mmol/l represents a clear cutoff in terms of the risk of future diabetes and in terms of elevated cardiovascular risk factor levels, and to examine the use of other lower limits of IFG. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A population-based survey of the island of Mauritius was undertaken in 1987, with a follow-up survey 5 years later. On both occasions, an oral glucose tolerance test was performed and cardiovascular risk factors were measured. RESULTS: Data were available from 4,721 nondiabetic people at baseline, and from 3,542 at follow-up. At baseline, blood pressure, lipids, and obesity increased in a linear fashion with increasing FPG, with no evidence of a threshold effect. The risk of developing hypertension at follow-up was greater for those people with baseline FPG > or =6.1 mmol/l (P<0.001). The risk of developing diabetes at follow-up increased with increasing baseline FPG, but there was little evidence of a threshold near 6.1 mmol/l. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular risk and risk of future diabetes increase continually with increasing FPG, and there is no threshold value on which to base a definition of IFG. If a lower limit of approximately 5.8 mmol/l is used, the category defines a group more similar to the group with impaired glucose tolerance, with regard to total prevalence and the risk of subsequent diabetes.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
J. L. Kitzmiller, L. Dang-Kilduff, and M. M. Taslimi
Gestational Diabetes After Delivery: Short-term management and long-term risks
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2007; 30(Supplement_2): S225 - S235.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
J. E. Shaw, P. Z. Zimmet, and K. G. M.M. Alberti
Point: Impaired Fasting Glucose: The Case for the New American Diabetes Association Criterion
Diabetes Care, May 1, 2006; 29(5): 1170 - 1172.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
S. M. Haffner
Abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular risk in pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., May 1, 2006; 8(suppl_B): B20 - B25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
D. E. Williams, B. L. Cadwell, Y. J. Cheng, C. C. Cowie, E. W. Gregg, L. S. Geiss, M. M. Engelgau, K. M. V. Narayan, and G. Imperatore
Prevalence of Impaired Fasting Glucose and Its Relationship With Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in US Adolescents, 1999-2000
Pediatrics, November 1, 2005; 116(5): 1122 - 1126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. Tirosh, I. Shai, D. Tekes-Manova, E. Israeli, D. Pereg, T. Shochat, I. Kochba, A. Rudich, and the Israeli Diabetes Research Group
Normal Fasting Plasma Glucose Levels and Type 2 Diabetes in Young Men
N. Engl. J. Med., October 6, 2005; 353(14): 1454 - 1462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M.-E. Piche, J.-F. Arcand-Bosse, J.-P. Despres, L. Perusse, S. Lemieux, and S. J. Weisnagel
What is a Normal Glucose Value?: Differences in indexes of plasma glucose homeostasis in subjects with normal fasting glucose
Diabetes Care, October 1, 2004; 27(10): 2470 - 2477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
E. S. Tai, S. Y. Goh, J. J.M. Lee, M.-S. Wong, D. Heng, K. Hughes, S. K. Chew, J. Cutter, W. Chew, K. Gu, et al.
Lowering the Criterion for Impaired Fasting Glucose: Impact on disease prevalence and associated risk of diabetes and ischemic heart disease
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2004; 27(7): 1728 - 1734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. DiabetesHome page
Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classificati
Follow-up Report on the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus
Clin. Diabetes, April 1, 2004; 22(2): 71 - 79.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes Spectr.Home page
Follow-up Report on the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes Spectr, January 1, 2004; 17(1): 51 - 59.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
D.-J. Kim, K.-W. Kim, N.-H. Cho, J.-H. Noh, M.-S. Lee, and M.-K. Lee
The Cutoff Value of Fasting Plasma Glucose to Differentiate Frequencies of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in a Korean Population
Diabetes Care, December 1, 2003; 26(12): 3354 - 3356.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classifi
Follow-up Report on the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes Care, November 1, 2003; 26(11): 3160 - 3167.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
I. Mogren, B. Lindahl, and U. Hogberg
Impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance are related to both heredity and low birth weight
Scand J Public Health, October 1, 2003; 31(5): 382 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
H. Ohnishi, S. Saitoh, S. Takagi, J.-i. Ohata, T. Isobe, Y. Kikuchi, H. Takeuchi, and K. Shimamoto
Pulse Wave Velocity as an Indicator of Atherosclerosis in Impaired Fasting Glucose: The Tanno and Sobetsu Study
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2003; 26(2): 437 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E. Barrett-Connor
The oral glucose tolerance test, revisited
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2002; 23(16): 1229 - 1231.
[PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
H. C. Gerstein
Fasting Versus Postload Glucose Levels: Why the controversy?
Diabetes Care, November 1, 2001; 24(11): 1855 - 1857.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2000 by the American Diabetes Association.