|
Diabetes Care, Vol 23, Issue 1 34-39, Copyright © 2000 by American Diabetes Association
Impaired fasting glucose: how low should it go?
JE Shaw, PZ Zimmet, AM Hodge, M de Courten, GK Dowse, P Chitson, J Tuomilehto and KG Alberti
International Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia. jshotham@hotmail.com
OBJECTIVE: Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) has been recently introduced as a
stage of abnormal carbohydrate metabolism, but the evidence on which its
glucose limits (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] 6.1-6.9 mmol/l) are based is
not strong. The aim of this study was to determine if 6.1 mmol/l represents
a clear cutoff in terms of the risk of future diabetes and in terms of
elevated cardiovascular risk factor levels, and to examine the use of other
lower limits of IFG. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A population-based survey
of the island of Mauritius was undertaken in 1987, with a follow-up survey
5 years later. On both occasions, an oral glucose tolerance test was
performed and cardiovascular risk factors were measured. RESULTS: Data were
available from 4,721 nondiabetic people at baseline, and from 3,542 at
follow-up. At baseline, blood pressure, lipids, and obesity increased in a
linear fashion with increasing FPG, with no evidence of a threshold effect.
The risk of developing hypertension at follow-up was greater for those
people with baseline FPG > or =6.1 mmol/l (P<0.001). The risk of
developing diabetes at follow-up increased with increasing baseline FPG,
but there was little evidence of a threshold near 6.1 mmol/l. CONCLUSIONS:
Cardiovascular risk and risk of future diabetes increase continually with
increasing FPG, and there is no threshold value on which to base a
definition of IFG. If a lower limit of approximately 5.8 mmol/l is used,
the category defines a group more similar to the group with impaired
glucose tolerance, with regard to total prevalence and the risk of
subsequent diabetes.

CiteULike Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Kitzmiller, L. Dang-Kilduff, and M. M. Taslimi
Gestational Diabetes After Delivery: Short-term management and long-term risks
Diabetes Care,
July 1, 2007;
30(Supplement_2):
S225 - S235.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Shaw, P. Z. Zimmet, and K. G. M.M. Alberti
Point: Impaired Fasting Glucose: The Case for the New American Diabetes Association Criterion
Diabetes Care,
May 1, 2006;
29(5):
1170 - 1172.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Haffner
Abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular risk in pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes
Eur. Heart J. Suppl.,
May 1, 2006;
8(suppl_B):
B20 - B25.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. E. Williams, B. L. Cadwell, Y. J. Cheng, C. C. Cowie, E. W. Gregg, L. S. Geiss, M. M. Engelgau, K. M. V. Narayan, and G. Imperatore
Prevalence of Impaired Fasting Glucose and Its Relationship With Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in US Adolescents, 1999-2000
Pediatrics,
November 1, 2005;
116(5):
1122 - 1126.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Tirosh, I. Shai, D. Tekes-Manova, E. Israeli, D. Pereg, T. Shochat, I. Kochba, A. Rudich, and the Israeli Diabetes Research Group
Normal Fasting Plasma Glucose Levels and Type 2 Diabetes in Young Men
N. Engl. J. Med.,
October 6, 2005;
353(14):
1454 - 1462.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-E. Piche, J.-F. Arcand-Bosse, J.-P. Despres, L. Perusse, S. Lemieux, and S. J. Weisnagel
What is a Normal Glucose Value?: Differences in indexes of plasma glucose homeostasis in subjects with normal fasting glucose
Diabetes Care,
October 1, 2004;
27(10):
2470 - 2477.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. S. Tai, S. Y. Goh, J. J.M. Lee, M.-S. Wong, D. Heng, K. Hughes, S. K. Chew, J. Cutter, W. Chew, K. Gu, et al.
Lowering the Criterion for Impaired Fasting Glucose: Impact on disease prevalence and associated risk of diabetes and ischemic heart disease
Diabetes Care,
July 1, 2004;
27(7):
1728 - 1734.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classificati
Follow-up Report on the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus
Clin. Diabetes,
April 1, 2004;
22(2):
71 - 79.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Follow-up Report on the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes Spectr,
January 1, 2004;
17(1):
51 - 59.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D.-J. Kim, K.-W. Kim, N.-H. Cho, J.-H. Noh, M.-S. Lee, and M.-K. Lee
The Cutoff Value of Fasting Plasma Glucose to Differentiate Frequencies of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in a Korean Population
Diabetes Care,
December 1, 2003;
26(12):
3354 - 3356.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classifi
Follow-up Report on the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes Care,
November 1, 2003;
26(11):
3160 - 3167.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Mogren, B. Lindahl, and U. Hogberg
Impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance are related to both heredity and low birth weight
Scand J Public Health,
October 1, 2003;
31(5):
382 - 388.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Ohnishi, S. Saitoh, S. Takagi, J.-i. Ohata, T. Isobe, Y. Kikuchi, H. Takeuchi, and K. Shimamoto
Pulse Wave Velocity as an Indicator of Atherosclerosis in Impaired Fasting Glucose: The Tanno and Sobetsu Study
Diabetes Care,
February 1, 2003;
26(2):
437 - 440.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Barrett-Connor
The oral glucose tolerance test, revisited
Eur. Heart J.,
August 2, 2002;
23(16):
1229 - 1231.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. C. Gerstein
Fasting Versus Postload Glucose Levels: Why the controversy?
Diabetes Care,
November 1, 2001;
24(11):
1855 - 1857.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Diabetes Association.
|
|
| |
|