Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, R.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, R.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 23, Issue 11 1612-1618, Copyright © 2000 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Appropriate insulin regimes for type 2 diabetes: a multicenter randomized crossover study

R Taylor, R Davies, C Fox, M Sampson, JU Weaver and L Wood
Diabetes Center, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. roy.taylor@ncl.ac.uk

OBJECTIVE: To directly compare the rate of hypoglycemia and metabolic control achieved on once-daily ultralente insulin administration with twice-daily NPH insulin administration in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patient treatment satisfaction and quality of life were also examined before and during each treatment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A crossover study was performed involving five centers and 79 patients with type 2 diabetes (fasting blood glucose > 8 mmol/l) with a 2-month run-in followed by two 6-month periods of either NPH or ultralente insulin administration. Patients were managed by a specialist nurse using a dosage adjustment protocol. RESULTS: HbA1c was lower with NPH insulin therapy during each of the 6-month periods (9.7 +/- 0.2 vs. 9.1 +/- 0.3 and 9.8 +/- 0.2 vs. 9.0 +/- 0.3 mmol/l; both P < 0.01). The difference was accounted for by higher evening glucose levels with ultralente insulin (fasting 8.2 +/- 0.3 vs. 8.2 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, 6:00 P.M. 11.5 +/- 0.4 vs. 10.6 +/- 0.4 mmol/l). Despite worse control, the total number of hypoglycemic episodes was greater with ultralente insulin (220 vs. 171), and hypoglycemic episodes requiring third-party assistance occurred almost entirely with ultralente (14 vs. 1). Treatment satisfaction scores increased more with NPH insulin compared with ultralente and rose further upon changing to NPH insulin, but fell upon changing to ultralente insulin. These changes were highly significant (P < 0.001). Diabetes quality of life improved on both regimens. CONCLUSIONS: These data clearly demonstrate the lower hypoglycemia rate, better glucose control, and greater treatment satisfaction accompanying therapy for type 2 diabetes with twice daily NPH compared with once daily ultralente insulin.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. H. Barnett, M. Dreyer, P. Lange, M. Serdarevic-Pehar, and on behalf of the Exubera Phase III Study Group
An Open, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety Profile of Inhaled Human Insulin (Exubera) With Glibenclamide as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Poorly Controlled on Metformin
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2006; 29(8): 1818 - 1825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular DiseaseHome page
T. J Hendra
Review: Diabetes and insulin therapy in older people
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, January 1, 2005; 5(1): 19 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
R. G. Bretzel, S. Arnolds, J. Medding, and T. Linn
A Direct Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Insulin Aspart, Human Soluble Insulin, and Human Premix Insulin (70/30) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, May 1, 2004; 27(5): 1023 - 1027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
K. K. Daugherty
Review of Insulin Therapy
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, February 1, 2004; 17(1): 10 - 19.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. R. Weiss, S.-L. Cheng, I. A. Kourides, R. A. Gelfand, and W. H. Landschulz
Inhaled Insulin Provides Improved Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled With Oral Agents: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Arch Intern Med, October 27, 2003; 163(19): 2277 - 2282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. E. DeWitt and I. B. Hirsch
Outpatient Insulin Therapy in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Scientific Review
JAMA, May 7, 2003; 289(17): 2254 - 2264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
Other Articles Noted
Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2001; 4(4): E1 - 11.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Comparing Insulin Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes
Journal Watch (General), December 5, 2000; 2000(1205): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2000 by the American Diabetes Association.