Diabetes Care, Vol 23, Issue 12 1725-1730, Copyright © 2000 by American Diabetes Association
Long-term renoprotective effect of nisoldipine and lisinopril in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy
L Tarnow, P Rossing, C Jensen, BV Hansen and HH Parving
Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark. lise.tarnow@dadlnet.dk
OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term effect on kidney function of a
long-acting calcium antagonist (nisoldipine) versus a long-acting ACE
inhibitor (lisinopril) in hypertensive type 1 diabetic patients with
diabetic nephropathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a 4-year
prospective, randomized, double-dummy controlled study comparing
nisoldipine (20-40 mg once a day) with lisinopril (10-20 mg once a day).
The study was double-blinded for the first year and single-blinded
thereafter. The study included 51 hypertensive type 1 diabetic patients
with diabetic nephropathy. Three patients dropped out during the first
month; results for the remaining 48 patients are presented. RESULTS: At
baseline, the two groups were comparable: glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
was 85 +/- 5 and 85 +/- 6 ml x min(-1) x [1.73 m](-2); mean 24-h ambulatory
blood pressure was 108 +/- 3 and 105 +/- 2 mmHg, and albuminuria was 1,554
mg/24 h (95% CI 980-2,465) and 1,033 mg/24 h (760-1,406) in the lisinopril
and nisoldipine groups, respectively. Mean 24-h arterial blood pressure
during the study did not differ between the lisinopril and nisoldipine
groups (100 +/- 2 and 103 +/- 1 mmHg, respectively). The time-course of
albuminuria differed between groups (P < 0.001). Whereas initiation of
treatment with lisinopril resulted in a reduction from baseline albuminuria
by 52% (95% CI 14-73), albuminuria in the nisoldipine group did not change
throughout the study GFR declined in a biphasic manner with an initial (0-6
months) reduction of 1.3 +/- 0.3 ml x min(-1) x month(-1) in the lisinopril
group compared with 0.2 +/- 0.4 ml x min(-1) x month(-1) in the nisoldipine
group (P < 0.01). The subsequent sustained decline (6 to 48 months or
the end of treatment) was identical in the two groups: 0.5 +/- 0.1 ml
min(-1) x month(-1) (NS). Two patients in the lisinopril group and three
patients in the nisoldipine group entered therapy for end-stage renal
failure. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with lisinopril or nisoldipine
has similar beneficial effects on progression of diabetic nephropathy in
hypertensive type 1 diabetic patients.