Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tarnow, L.
Right arrow Articles by Parving, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tarnow, L.
Right arrow Articles by Parving, H. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 23, Issue 12 1725-1730, Copyright © 2000 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Long-term renoprotective effect of nisoldipine and lisinopril in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy

L Tarnow, P Rossing, C Jensen, BV Hansen and HH Parving
Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark. lise.tarnow@dadlnet.dk

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term effect on kidney function of a long-acting calcium antagonist (nisoldipine) versus a long-acting ACE inhibitor (lisinopril) in hypertensive type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a 4-year prospective, randomized, double-dummy controlled study comparing nisoldipine (20-40 mg once a day) with lisinopril (10-20 mg once a day). The study was double-blinded for the first year and single-blinded thereafter. The study included 51 hypertensive type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. Three patients dropped out during the first month; results for the remaining 48 patients are presented. RESULTS: At baseline, the two groups were comparable: glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 85 +/- 5 and 85 +/- 6 ml x min(-1) x [1.73 m](-2); mean 24-h ambulatory blood pressure was 108 +/- 3 and 105 +/- 2 mmHg, and albuminuria was 1,554 mg/24 h (95% CI 980-2,465) and 1,033 mg/24 h (760-1,406) in the lisinopril and nisoldipine groups, respectively. Mean 24-h arterial blood pressure during the study did not differ between the lisinopril and nisoldipine groups (100 +/- 2 and 103 +/- 1 mmHg, respectively). The time-course of albuminuria differed between groups (P < 0.001). Whereas initiation of treatment with lisinopril resulted in a reduction from baseline albuminuria by 52% (95% CI 14-73), albuminuria in the nisoldipine group did not change throughout the study GFR declined in a biphasic manner with an initial (0-6 months) reduction of 1.3 +/- 0.3 ml x min(-1) x month(-1) in the lisinopril group compared with 0.2 +/- 0.4 ml x min(-1) x month(-1) in the nisoldipine group (P < 0.01). The subsequent sustained decline (6 to 48 months or the end of treatment) was identical in the two groups: 0.5 +/- 0.1 ml min(-1) x month(-1) (NS). Two patients in the lisinopril group and three patients in the nisoldipine group entered therapy for end-stage renal failure. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with lisinopril or nisoldipine has similar beneficial effects on progression of diabetic nephropathy in hypertensive type 1 diabetic patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
G. Yasuda, D. Ando, N. Hirawa, S. Umemura, and O. Tochikubo
Effects of Losartan and Amlodipine on Urinary Albumin Excretion and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Overt Nephropathy
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2005; 28(8): 1862 - 1868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
Z. T. Bloomgarden
Diabetic Nephropathy
Diabetes Care, March 1, 2005; 28(3): 745 - 751.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. J. Krimholtz, J. Karalliedde, S. Thomas, R. Bilous, and G. Viberti
Targeting Albumin Excretion Rate in the Treatment of the Hypertensive Diabetic Patient with Renal Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2005; 16(3_suppl_1): S42 - S47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
G. Deferrari, M. Ravera, V. Berruti, G. Leoncini, and L. Deferrari
Optimizing Therapy in the Diabetic Patient with Renal Disease: Antihypertensive Treatment
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2004; 15(90010): S6 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
G. Deferrari, M. Ravera, L. Deferrari, S. Vettoretti, E. Ratto, and D. Parodi
Renal and Cardiovascular Protection in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2002; 13(90003): S224 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
P. Swales and B. Williams
Review: Calcium channel blockade in combination with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition or angiotensin II (AT1-receptor) antagonism in hypertensive diabetics and patients with renal disease and hypertension
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2002; 3(2): 79 - 89.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
H. Herlitz, K. Harris, T. Risler, G. Boner, J. Bernheim, J. Chanard, and M. Aurell
The effects of an ACE inhibitor and a calcium antagonist on the progression of renal disease: the Nephros Study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2158 - 2165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2000 by the American Diabetes Association.