Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liesenfeld, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hepp, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liesenfeld, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hepp, K. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 23, Issue 3 345-348, Copyright © 2000 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

A telemedical approach to the screening of diabetic retinopathy: digital fundus photography

B Liesenfeld, E Kohner, W Piehlmeier, S Kluthe, S Aldington, M Porta, T Bek, M Obermaier, H Mayer, G Mann, R Holle and KD Hepp
Third Department of Medicine, Bogenhausen Hospital, Munich, Germany. ug142cq@mail.lrz-muenchen.de

OBJECTIVE: The importance of screening for diabetic retinopathy has been established, but the best method for screening has not yet been determined. We report on a trial of assessment of digital photographs by telemedicine compared with standard retinal photographs of the same fields and clinical examination by ophthalmologists. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 129 diabetic inpatients were screened for diabetic retinopathy by slit-lamp biomicroscopy performed by an ophthalmologist and by two-field 50 degrees non-stereo digital fundus photographs assessed by six screening centers that received the images by electronic mail. Conventional 35-mm transparencies of the same fields as the digital photographs were assessed by a retinal specialist and served as the reference method for detection of diabetic retinopathy. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy was the reference method for the detection of macular edema. RESULTS: The prevalence of any form of diabetic retinopathy was 30% (n = 35); of sight-threatening retinopathy including macular edema, the prevalence was 6% (n = 7). The assessment of digital images by the six screening centers resulted in a median sensitivity of 85% and a median specificity of 90% for the detection of moderate nonproliferative or sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. Clinically significant macular edema (n = 4) was correctly identified in 15 of the 24 grading reports. An additional seven reports referred the patients for further investigation because of concurrent diabetic retinopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Telescreening for diabetic retinopathy by an assessment of two-field 50 degrees non-stereo digital images is a valid screening method. Although detection of clinically significant macular edema using biomicroscopy is superior to digital or standard non-stereo photographs, only few patients with sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy are missed.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Telemed TelecareHome page
M. A. Johansen, K. Fossen, J. Norum, T. Christoffersen, H. Oritsland, D. Haga, P. Hasvold, J. G. Bellika, U. Knarvik, and S. Pedersen
The potential of digital monochrome images versus colour slides in telescreening for diabetic retinopathy
J Telemed Telecare, April 1, 2008; 14(1): 27 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
J. Ahmed, T. P. Ward, S.-E. Bursell, L. M. Aiello, J. D. Cavallerano, and R. A. Vigersky
The Sensitivity and Specificity of Nonmydriatic Digital Stereoscopic Retinal Imaging in Detecting Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetes Care, October 1, 2006; 29(10): 2205 - 2209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
Y. Han, M. E. Schneck, M. A. Bearse Jr, S. Barez, C. H. Jacobsen, N. P. Jewell, and A. J. Adams
Formulation and Evaluation of a Predictive Model to Identify the Sites of Future Diabetic Retinopathy
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 4106 - 4112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. A. Bearse Jr, Y. Han, M. E. Schneck, S. Barez, C. Jacobsen, and A. J. Adams
Local Multifocal Oscillatory Potential Abnormalities in Diabetes and Early Diabetic Retinopathy
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 3259 - 3265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
Y. Han, M. A. Bearse Jr, M. E. Schneck, S. Barez, C. H. Jacobsen, and A. J. Adams
Multifocal Electroretinogram Delays Predict Sites of Subsequent Diabetic Retinopathy
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2004; 45(3): 948 - 954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
T. A. Ciulla, A. G. Amador, and B. Zinman
Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema: Pathophysiology, screening, and novel therapies
Diabetes Care, September 1, 2003; 26(9): 2653 - 2664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
D. Maberley, H. Walker, A. Koushik, and A. Cruess
Screening for diabetic retinopathy in James Bay, Ontario: a cost-effectiveness analysis
Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 21, 2003; 168(2): 160 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
F. Gomez-Ulla, M. I. Fernandez, F. Gonzalez, P. Rey, M. Rodriguez, M. J. Rodriguez-Cid, F. F. Casanueva, M. A. Tome, J. Garcia-Tobio, and F. Gude
Digital Retinal Images and Teleophthalmology for Detecting and Grading Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2002; 25(8): 1384 - 1389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2000 by the American Diabetes Association.