|
Diabetes Care, Vol 23, Issue 3 345-348, Copyright © 2000 by American Diabetes Association
A telemedical approach to the screening of diabetic retinopathy: digital fundus photography
B Liesenfeld, E Kohner, W Piehlmeier, S Kluthe, S Aldington, M Porta, T Bek, M Obermaier, H Mayer, G Mann, R Holle and KD Hepp
Third Department of Medicine, Bogenhausen Hospital, Munich, Germany. ug142cq@mail.lrz-muenchen.de
OBJECTIVE: The importance of screening for diabetic retinopathy has been
established, but the best method for screening has not yet been determined.
We report on a trial of assessment of digital photographs by telemedicine
compared with standard retinal photographs of the same fields and clinical
examination by ophthalmologists. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of
129 diabetic inpatients were screened for diabetic retinopathy by slit-lamp
biomicroscopy performed by an ophthalmologist and by two-field 50 degrees
non-stereo digital fundus photographs assessed by six screening centers
that received the images by electronic mail. Conventional 35-mm
transparencies of the same fields as the digital photographs were assessed
by a retinal specialist and served as the reference method for detection of
diabetic retinopathy. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy was the reference method for
the detection of macular edema. RESULTS: The prevalence of any form of
diabetic retinopathy was 30% (n = 35); of sight-threatening retinopathy
including macular edema, the prevalence was 6% (n = 7). The assessment of
digital images by the six screening centers resulted in a median
sensitivity of 85% and a median specificity of 90% for the detection of
moderate nonproliferative or sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy.
Clinically significant macular edema (n = 4) was correctly identified in 15
of the 24 grading reports. An additional seven reports referred the
patients for further investigation because of concurrent diabetic
retinopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Telescreening for diabetic retinopathy by an
assessment of two-field 50 degrees non-stereo digital images is a valid
screening method. Although detection of clinically significant macular
edema using biomicroscopy is superior to digital or standard non-stereo
photographs, only few patients with sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy
are missed.

CiteULike Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Johansen, K. Fossen, J. Norum, T. Christoffersen, H. Oritsland, D. Haga, P. Hasvold, J. G. Bellika, U. Knarvik, and S. Pedersen
The potential of digital monochrome images versus colour slides in telescreening for diabetic retinopathy
J Telemed Telecare,
April 1, 2008;
14(1):
27 - 31.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Ahmed, T. P. Ward, S.-E. Bursell, L. M. Aiello, J. D. Cavallerano, and R. A. Vigersky
The Sensitivity and Specificity of Nonmydriatic Digital Stereoscopic Retinal Imaging in Detecting Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetes Care,
October 1, 2006;
29(10):
2205 - 2209.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Han, M. E. Schneck, M. A. Bearse Jr, S. Barez, C. H. Jacobsen, N. P. Jewell, and A. J. Adams
Formulation and Evaluation of a Predictive Model to Identify the Sites of Future Diabetic Retinopathy
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
November 1, 2004;
45(11):
4106 - 4112.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Bearse Jr, Y. Han, M. E. Schneck, S. Barez, C. Jacobsen, and A. J. Adams
Local Multifocal Oscillatory Potential Abnormalities in Diabetes and Early Diabetic Retinopathy
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
September 1, 2004;
45(9):
3259 - 3265.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Han, M. A. Bearse Jr, M. E. Schneck, S. Barez, C. H. Jacobsen, and A. J. Adams
Multifocal Electroretinogram Delays Predict Sites of Subsequent Diabetic Retinopathy
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
March 1, 2004;
45(3):
948 - 954.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Ciulla, A. G. Amador, and B. Zinman
Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema: Pathophysiology, screening, and novel therapies
Diabetes Care,
September 1, 2003;
26(9):
2653 - 2664.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Maberley, H. Walker, A. Koushik, and A. Cruess
Screening for diabetic retinopathy in James Bay, Ontario: a cost-effectiveness analysis
Can. Med. Assoc. J.,
January 21, 2003;
168(2):
160 - 164.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Gomez-Ulla, M. I. Fernandez, F. Gonzalez, P. Rey, M. Rodriguez, M. J. Rodriguez-Cid, F. F. Casanueva, M. A. Tome, J. Garcia-Tobio, and F. Gude
Digital Retinal Images and Teleophthalmology for Detecting and Grading Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetes Care,
August 1, 2002;
25(8):
1384 - 1389.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Diabetes Association.
|
|
| |
|