Diabetes Care, Vol 23, Issue 3 360-364, Copyright © 2000 by American Diabetes Association

ARTICLES

Effects of nicotinamide and intravenous insulin therapy in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes

J Vidal, M Fernandez-Balsells, G Sesmilo, E Aguilera, R Casamitjana, R Gomis and I Conget
Endocrinology and Diabetes Unit, Institut d'Investigacions Biomedicas August Pi i Sunyer, Hospital Clinic i Universitari, Barcelona, Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of intravenous insulin therapy combined with nicotinamide in the metabolic control and beta-cell function of newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic subjects in comparison with intensive insulin therapy and nicotinamide alone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 34 newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic patients were included. After the correction of initial metabolic disturbances, subjects were randomly assigned to the following three groups within 72 h after admission: 1) intensive insulin therapy + placebo (C) (n = 12); 2) intensive insulin therapy + nicotinamide, 700 mg three times a day (NIC) (n = 11); and 3) 72-h intravenous insulin followed by intensive insulin therapy + nicotinamide, 700 mg three times a day (NIV) (n = 11). The subjects were monitored for 12 months. GAD, tyrosine phosphatase antibodies, and insulin autoantibodies were measured. C-peptide was measured basally and after 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min of 1 mg intravenous glucagon. HbA1c, glucagon, and antibody measurements were determined initially and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS: HbA1c values declined to normal after treatment was initiated in all groups and remained not significantly different during the follow-up period. We did not find differences between experimental (NIC and NIV) and placebo (C) groups in terms of beta-cell function, considering basal or glucagon-stimulated C-peptide (maximal stimulated C-peptide and area under the curve [AUC] of C-peptide) values during the follow-up period. After pooling data from the NIC and NIV groups (both including nicotinamide) and comparing it with data from the C group, the results remained unchanged. At diagnosis, GAD positivity was observed in 10 of 12, 8 of 11, and 10 of 11 subjects (NS) in the C, NIC, and NIV groups, respectively, and IA2 positivity was observed in 3 of 12, 4 of 11, and 4 of 11 subjects (NS) in the C, NIC, and NIV groups, respectively. Antibody titers displayed a similar behavior in all groups during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot study failed to demonstrate that the addition of 72-h intravenous insulin and nicotinamide to conventional intensive insulin therapy produces any beneficial effect in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic subjects in terms of beta-cell function and metabolic control.
CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Fernandez, M. Gimenez, G. Diaz, and I. Conget Accuracy and Predictive Value of Classification Schemes for Ketosis-Prone Diabetes: Response to Balasubramanyam et al. Diabetes Care, September 1, 2007; 30(9): e96 - e96. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Greenbaum and L. C. Harrison Guidelines for Intervention Trials in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes, May 1, 2003; 52(5): 1059 - 1065. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Virag and C. Szabo The Therapeutic Potential of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2002; 54(3): 375 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]