Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Diabetes Care 29:241-246, 2006
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1468
© 2006 by the American Diabetes Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pogach, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Aron, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pogach, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Aron, D. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Epidemiology/Health Services/Psychosocial Research
Original Article

Comparison of Weighted Performance Measurement and Dichotomous Thresholds for Glycemic Control in the Veterans Health Administration

Leonard M. Pogach, MD, MBA1,2, Mangala Rajan, MBA1 and David C. Aron, MD, MS3,4

1 New Jersey Veterans Healthcare System, East Orange, New Jersey
2 University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey
3 Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
4 Division of Clinical and Molecular Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

Address correspondence and reprint requests to David Aron, MD, MS, Education Office (14W), Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, 10701 East Blvd., Cleveland, OH 44106. E-mail: david.aron{at}med.va.gov

OBJECTIVE—Quality measures of glycemic control using threshold values do not assess incremental quality improvement. We compared health care system performance using weighted continuous versus dichotomous measures for glycemic control.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We performed retrospective cross-sectional analysis of chart abstraction data on 37,142 diabetic patients from 141 Veterans Health Administration medical centers in 2000–2001.

RESULTS—Subjects per facility ranged from 163 to 740 (mean 263). Mean overall HbA1c (A1C) was 7.58%. A continuous measure for glycemic control was calculated based on percentage of maximal quality-adjusted life-years saved (QALYsS). Overall mean facility performance using the dichotomous measure was 62% <8% A1C (range 48–75%) and 39% <7% A1C (21–57%), in comparison with 45% maximal QALYsS (31–60%). Correlation between QALYsS and A1C thresholds of <8 (0.848) and <7 (0.838) for facility rankings was excellent; correlation between facility level performance using thresholds of <8 and 7% was poor (r = 0.13, P = 0.14). Comparison of facility rankings between the <7% dichotomous measure and the QALYsS-weighted measure showed that 22% changed their ranking by ≥2 deciles with marked changes in top and bottom deciles.

CONCLUSIONS—Facility rankings vary by threshold or continuous methodology. However, because significant numbers of individuals are unable to reach "optimal" target goals (thresholds) even in clinical trials with extensive exclusion criteria, we propose that a continuous measure assessing improvement toward optimal A1C, rather than a pass/fail optimal target, is both a fairer assessment clinical practice and a more accurate reflection of population health improvement.

Abbreviations: QALY, quality-adjusted life-year • QALYsS, QALYs saved


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2006 by the American Diabetes Association.