HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Plank, J. Articles by Pieber, T. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Plank, J. Articles by Pieber, T. R. Social Bookmarking                What's this?

Multicentric, Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate Blood Glucose Control by the Model Predictive Control Algorithm Versus Routine Glucose Management Protocols in Intensive Care Unit Patients

¹ Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Hospital, Graz, Austria
² Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
³ Adult Intensive Care Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, U.K.
⁴ Department of Paediatrics, Cambridge University, Cambridge, U.K.
⁵ Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Hospital, Graz, Austria

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Johannes Plank, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036 Graz, Austria. E-mail: johannes.plank{at}klinikum-graz.at

OBJECTIVE—To evaluate a fully automated algorithm for the establishment of tight glycemic control in critically ill patients and to compare the results with different routine glucose management protocols of three intensive care units (ICUs) across Europe (Graz, Prague, and London).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Sixty patients undergoing cardiac surgery (age 67 ± 9 years, BMI 27.7 ± 4.9 kg/m², 17 women) with postsurgery blood glucose levels >120 mg/dl (6.7 mmol/l) were investigated in three different ICUs (20 per center). Patients were randomized to either blood glucose management (target range 80–110 mg/dl [4.4–6.1 mmol/l]) by the fully automated model predictive control (MPC) algorithm (n = 30, 10 per center) or implemented routine glucose management protocols (n = 30, 10 per center). In all patients, arterial glucose was measured hourly to describe the glucose profile until the end of the ICU stay but for a maximum period of 48 h.

RESULTS—Compared with routine protocols, MPC treatment resulted in a significantly higher percentage of time within the target glycemic range (% median [min–max]: 52 [17–92] vs. 19 [0–71]) over 0–24 h (P < 0.01). Improved glycemic control with MPC treatment was confirmed in patients remaining in the ICU for 48 h (0–24 h: 50 [17–71] vs. 21 [4–67], P < 0.05, and 24–48 h: 65 [38–96] vs. 25 [8–79], P < 0.05, for MPC [n = 16] vs. routine protocol [n = 13], respectively). Two hypoglycemic events (<54 mg/dl [3.0 mmol/l]) were observed with routine protocol treatment. No hypoglycemic event occurred with MPC.

CONCLUSIONS—The data suggest that the MPC algorithm is safe and effective in controlling glycemia in critically ill postsurgery patients.

Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit • MPC, model predictive control

CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?