HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: dc07-1572v1 31/1/81    most recent Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hoerger, T. J. Articles by Saaddine, J. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hoerger, T. J. Articles by Saaddine, J. B. Social Bookmarking                What's this?

Is Glycemic Control Improving in U.S. Adults?

¹ RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
² Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Thomas J. Hoerger, Director, RTI-UNC Center of Excellence in Health Promotion Economics, RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Rd., P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. E-mail: tjh{at}rti.org

OBJECTIVE—The purpose of this study was to examine whether glycemic control has improved in recent years among individuals with diagnosed diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We examined trends in A1C levels for adults with diagnosed diabetes using three consecutive waves of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES): 1999–2000, 2001–2002, and 2003–2004. We estimated mean A1C levels and the proportion with A1C <7.0, <8.0, and <9.0%. We used multivariate regression to test whether A1C levels differed by NHANES wave after controlling for other factors. Multivariate dichotomous logistic regression and predictive margins were used to test whether the percentages of individuals with diabetes in selected A1C intervals differed by NHANES wave.

RESULTS—Mean A1C levels among individuals with diagnosed diabetes declined from 7.82% in 1999–2000 to 7.47 and 7.18% in 2001–2002 and 2003–2004, respectively. After controlling for demographics and diabetes duration, A1C levels were 0.308 (P = 0.20) and 0.511 (P = 0.03) percentage points lower in 2001–2002 and 2003–2004, respectively, than in 1999–2000. The logistic results indicated corresponding improvements over time: the predictive margin for having A1C <7.0% increased from 37.0% in 1999–2000 to 49.7% in 2001–2002 and to 55.7% in 2003–2004.

CONCLUSIONS—Glycemic control improved between 1999 and 2004. This trend may represent an important improvement in diabetes care and is encouraging for future reduction of diabetes-related complications.

Abbreviations: DCCT, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial • NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey • UKPDS, UK Prospective Diabetes Study

CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. E. Bainbridge, C. C. Cowie, K. F. Rust, and J. E. Fradkin Mitigating Case Mix Factors by Choice of Glycemic Control Performance Measure Threshold Diabetes Care, September 1, 2008; 31(9): 1754 - 1760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. V. Joy Clinical Pearls and Strategies to Optimize Patient Outcomes The Diabetes Educator, May 1, 2008; 34(Supplement_3): 54S - 59S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Fradkin and G. P. Rodgers The Economic Imperative to Conquer Diabetes Diabetes Care, March 1, 2008; 31(3): 624 - 625. [Full Text] [PDF]