DOI: 10.2337/dc08-s235 © 2008 by the American Diabetes Association
Long-Acting Insulin Analogs Versus Insulin Pump Therapy for the Treatment of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
1 Metabolic Unit, King's College London School of Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, U.K Address correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. John Pickup, Metabolic Unit, King's College London School of Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, U.K. E-mail: john.pickup{at}kcl.ac.uk Insulin pump therapy (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]) is now an established form of intensive insulin treatment. It is pertinent to ask, however, if multiple daily injection (MDI) regimens based on new long-acting insulin analogs such as glargine and detemir have now replaced the need for CSII. In type 1 diabetes, CSII reduces the frequency of severe hypoglycemia compared with isophane-based MDIs, but the rate of severe hypoglycemia is usually similar on glargine- or detemir-based MDIs compared with isophane-based MDIs. CSII reduces A1C and glycemic variability compared with isophane-based MDIs; but glargine and detemir do not improve A1C or variability in many patients, particularly those who are prone to hypoglycemia. Head-to-head comparisons of CSII with MDI based on glargine indicate lower A1C, fructosamine, or glucose levels on CSII. It can be concluded that long-acting insulin analogs have not yet replaced the need for insulin pump therapy in type 1 diabetes, and CSII is the best current therapeutic option for some type 1 diabetic subjects. In type 2 diabetes, CSII and MDI produce similar glycemic control, although there is little study of MDI based on long-acting analogs compared with pumps. It is possible that CSII will be beneficial in selected patient groups with type 2 diabetes, but this requires further study.
Abbreviations: CSII, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion MDI, multiple daily injection
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||