Diabetes Care, Vol 7, Issue 6 590-594, Copyright © 1984 by American Diabetes Association

ARTICLES

Potential pitfalls in the use of Glucoscan and Glucoscan II meters for self-monitoring of blood glucose

VG Laus, MA Dietz and RP Levy

We discovered that skilled nurses only casually trained in the use of a fingertip blood glucose reflectance meter (Glucoscan, Lifescan, Mountainview, California) had a 36% incidence of unacceptable results (greater than 15% from reference). A controlled study was undertaken and showed that with Glucoscan I (GI) 4 of 27 readings were unacceptable and with Glucoscan II (GII) 3 of 27 readings were unacceptable, a statistically nonsignificant difference. Minor deviations from the manufacturer's recommended technique had a significant effect on the results with GI. In contrast, GII was much less sensitive to variations in recommended technique. GI underestimated the reference glucose concentration by 11.7%, and GII overestimated by 6.5%, a statistically significant difference. We conclude that the health professional must be aware of interdevice and intradevice variability in self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Patients need careful training in the method of SMBG. The results of any single value should be interpreted with caution.
CiteULike    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. S. Strumph, C. L. Odoroff, and J. M. Amatruda The Accuracy of Blood Glucose Testing by Children Clinical Pediatrics, April 1, 1988; 27(4): 188 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF]