Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ehrlich, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clarson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ehrlich, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 8, Issue 4 354-358, Copyright © 1985 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Self-monitoring of blood glucose: how accurate are children with diabetes at reading chemstrip bG?

C Clarson, D Daneman, M Frank, J Link, K Perlman and RM Ehrlich

Accuracy of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) using Chemstrip bG (Bio-Dynamics, Indianapolis, Indiana) was studied in 90 randomly selected children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). For 28 children (mean age 8.3 +/- 3.6 yr) a parent routinely read the Chemstrip at home. The remaining 62 children (mean age 13.7 +/- 2.8 yr) read the Chemstrip themselves. Each child or parent analyzed 20 capillary blood samples using Chemstrips and answered a questionnaire on SMBG. The accuracy of SMBG of the group was high (mean correlation coefficient = 0.89 +/- 0.05), but consistency of measurement was variable (mean standard deviation = 1.90 +/- 0.57) and there was a general tendency to underread Chemstrips (mean y-intercept = 1.05 +/- 1.48; mean slope = 0.80 +/- 0.17). For each subject, 0-65% (mean of 34%) of readings were within 10% of the laboratory measurement, and 17-100% (mean 68%) within 20%. These results indicate that most subjects were fairly accurate in reading Chemstrips; however, analysis of accuracy is useful in identifying individuals who are inaccurate or inconsistent in SMBG. Continuing supervision of SMBG is necessary in children with IDDM.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Diabetes EducatorHome page
A. M. Delamater, S. G. Davis, J. Bubb, J. V. Santiago, J. A. Smith, and N. H. White
Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose by Adolescents With Diabetes: Technical Skills and Utilization of Data
The Diabetes Educator, January 1, 1989; 15(1): 56 - 61.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1985 by the American Diabetes Association.