Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolever, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Josse, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolever, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Josse, R. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diabetes Care, Vol 9, Issue 4 401-404, Copyright © 1986 by American Diabetes Association


ARTICLES

Glycemic response to pasta: effect of surface area, degree of cooking, and protein enrichment

TM Wolever, DJ Jenkins, J Kalmusky, C Giordano, S Giudici, AL Jenkins, LU Thompson, GS Wong and RG Josse

To see whether food form, the degree of cooking, or protein enrichment affected the glycemic response to pasta, we gave test-meal breakfasts to 13 diabetic patients. Macaroni had a significantly greater glycemic index (GI) (68 +/- 8) than spaghetti (45 +/- 6, P less than .01); the GI of star pastina was intermediate (54 +/- 6). The GI of spaghetti was not significantly affected by cooking for 5 or 15 min (45 +/- 6 and 46 +/- 5, respectively), or by protein enrichment (38 +/- 4). The GI of spaghetti was similar in 11 non-insulin-dependent and 6 insulin-dependent diabetic patients (49 +/- 7 compared with 57 +/- 8). We conclude that different types of pasta may produce different glycemic responses but that these are not necessarily related to differences in cooking or surface area.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
T. M. Wolever, A. L Gibbs, C. Mehling, J.-L. Chiasson, P. W Connelly, R. G Josse, L. A Leiter, P. Maheux, R. Rabasa-Lhoret, N W. Rodger, et al.
The Canadian Trial of Carbohydrates in Diabetes (CCD), a 1-y controlled trial of low-glycemic-index dietary carbohydrate in type 2 diabetes: no effect on glycated hemoglobin but reduction in C-reactive protein
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2008; 87(1): 114 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
S. Vega-Lopez, L. M. Ausman, J. L. Griffith, and A. H. Lichtenstein
Interindividual Variability and Intra-Individual Reproducibility of Glycemic Index Values for Commercial White Bread
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2007; 30(6): 1412 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. Foster-Powell, S. H. Holt, and J. C Brand-Miller
International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2002; 76(1): 5 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
F X. Pi-Sunyer
Glycemic index and disease
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2002; 76(1): 290S - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
S. B. Roberts, M. A. McCrory, and E. Saltzman
The Influence of Dietary Composition on Energy Intake and Body Weight
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2002; 21(2): 140S - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. S Juntunen, L. K Niskanen, K. H Liukkonen, K. S Poutanen, J. J Holst, and H. M Mykkanen
Postprandial glucose, insulin, and incretin responses to grain products in healthy subjects
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2002; 75(2): 254 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Raben, J. J Holst, J. Madsen, and A. Astrup
Diurnal metabolic profiles after 14 d of an ad libitum high-starch, high-sucrose, or high-fat diet in normal-weight never-obese and postobese women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2001; 73(2): 177 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 1986 by the American Diabetes Association.