Diabetes Care
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Diabetes Care 30:S194-S199, 2007
DOI: 10.2337/dc07-s215
© 2007 by the American Diabetes Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Landon, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Landon, M. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Original Article

The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Network Randomized Clinical Trial in Progress

Standard therapy versus no therapy for mild gestational diabetes

Mark B. Landon, MD1, Elizabeth Thom, PHD2, Catherine Y. Spong, MD3, Marshall Carpenter, MD4, Lisa Mele, MS2, Francee Johnson, RN1, JoAnn Tillinghast, RN4, Garland Anderson, MD5 For the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network, The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland*

1 Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
2 George Washington Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC
3 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland
4 Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
5 University of Texas at Galveston, Galveston, Texas

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Mark B. Landon, MD, The Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Means Hall, 5th Floor, 1654 Upham Dr., Columbus, OH 43210-1228. E-mail: landon.1@osu.edu

Abbreviations: GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus • MFMU, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
It is recognized that women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) who have significantly elevated fasting blood glucose levels are at increased risk for fetal macrosomia and perinatal morbidity if treatment is not provided (1,2). The association of milder forms of GDM with perinatal morbidity and mortality remains unclear, primarily because the condition is often confounded with other risk factors such as maternal obesity, age, and parity. Screening for GDM is recommended for most pregnant women, yet it is unknown whether there is a benefit to the identification and treatment of mild carbohydrate intolerance during pregnancy (3,4). The present report is an update of our previous description of a current ongoing randomized treatment trial for mild GDM (5). A randomized clinical trial of women with mild GDM (fasting glucose <95 mg/dl) is being undertaken that compares perinatal outcomes in those receiving diet therapy and insulin as required versus those randomized to no specific treatment. This study aims to clarify whether there is utility in identifying and treating women with a normal fasting glucose level who meet standard criteria for GDM. We plan to compare perinatal outcomes in women who have been randomized to diet and/or insulin therapy with women who have been randomized to no specific treatment. A randomized treatment trial of mild GDM will clarify whether identification and treatment of mild GDM reduce perinatal morbidity. This information will assist in determining appropriate thresholds for the treatment of GDM.


    BACKGROUND AND STUDY RATIONALE—
 
Overall, with broader identification and aggressive treatment, perinatal mortality rates associated with GDM appear to be similar to the nondiabetic population (1). Several analyses of 20 years ago did document an increased stillbirth rate for GDM pregnancies that would qualify as preexisting diabetes according to World Health Organization criteria (. . . [Full Text of this Article]


    STUDY DESIGN—
 

    STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS—
 

    SUMMARY—
 

    APPENDIX
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
T. A. Hillier, K. K. Vesco, K. L. Pedula, T. L. Beil, E. P. Whitlock, and D. J. Pettitt
Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, May 20, 2008; 148(10): 766 - 775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
The HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group
Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes
N. Engl. J. Med., May 8, 2008; 358(19): 1991 - 2002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2007 by the American Diabetes Association.