Cost-effectiveness of the Diabetes Care Protocol, a multifaceted computerized decision support diabetes management intervention that reduces cardiovascular risk.
- Frits G.W. Cleveringa, MD (f.g.w.cleveringa{at}umcutrecht.nl)1,
- Paco M.J. Welsing, PhD1,
- Maureen van den Donk, PhD1,
- Kees J. Gorter, PhD1,
- Louis W. Niessen, PhD2,3,4,
- Guy E.H.M. Rutten, PhD1 and
- William K. Redekop, PhD2
- 1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
- 2Department of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands
- 3 Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore
- 4 School of Medicine, Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich
Abstract
Objective: The Diabetes Care Protocol (DCP), a multifaceted computerized decision support diabetes management intervention, reduces cardiovascular risk of type 2 diabetes (DM2) patients. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of DCP from a Dutch health care perspective.
Research Design and Methods: A cluster randomized trial provided data of DCP versus usual care. The 1-year follow-up patient data were extrapolated using a modified Dutch micro-simulation diabetes model, computing individual lifetime, health related costs and health effects. Incremental costs and effectiveness (quality-adjusted life-years (QALY)) were estimated using multivariate generalized estimating equations to correct for practice-level clustering and confounding. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were created. Stroke costs were calculated separately. Subgroup analyses examined patients with and without cardiovascular disease (CVD+, CVD-).
Results: Excluding stroke, DCP patients lived longer (0.14 life-years, ns), experienced more QALYs (0.037, ns) and incurred higher total costs (€1,415, ns), resulting in an ICER of €38,243 per QALY gained. The likelihood of cost-effectiveness given a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000 per QALY gained is 30%. DCP had a more favorable effect on CVD+ patients (ICER=€14,814) than for CVD- patients (ICER=€121,285). Coronary heart disease costs were reduced (€-587 (p<0.05)).
Conclusions: DCP reduces cardiovascular risk, resulting in only a slight improvement in QALYs, lower CVD costs, but higher total costs, with a high cost-effectiveness ratio. Cost-effective care can be achieved by focusing on cardiovascular risk factors in DM2 patients with a history of cardiovascular disease.
Footnotes
-
- Received July 6, 2009.
- Accepted November 15, 2009.
- Copyright © American Diabetes Association














